Count To Five
Moderator: multi_s
- blakestree
- IAMILF
- Posts: 2305
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 3:36 pm
- Location: Savannah, GA USA
Re: Count To Five
What pot ohm does the CT5 like best?
While leaves shall fall, do branches intertwine, that we remain bound.
Blake's Tree
Blake's Tree
- multi_s
- IAMILF
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:00 pm
Re: Count To Five
blakestree wrote:What pot ohm does the CT5 like best?
anything 10k or more should be fine. Most pedals seem to be 10k,25k, 50k or 100k. Any of those should work fine.
S
- blakestree
- IAMILF
- Posts: 2305
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 3:36 pm
- Location: Savannah, GA USA
Re: Count To Five
But, you can get full range from a 10k?
While leaves shall fall, do branches intertwine, that we remain bound.
Blake's Tree
Blake's Tree
- multi_s
- IAMILF
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:00 pm
Re: Count To Five
blakestree wrote:But, you can get full range from a 10k?
You should be able to. originally it was not great but i changed the firmware i think since rev 0.931. Since then i have not had any complaints.
S
-
- involved
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 3:23 am
- Inconuucl
- Supporter
- Posts: 6407
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:35 pm
- Location: Boston, MA
Re: Count To Five
ogguitar wrote:Anyone using one of these for expression?
http://this1smyne.com/shop/me-mini-expression-pedal/
What's the most common expression value? These seem super interesting and I'd love to have one that would fit with most of my pedals.

- multi_s
- IAMILF
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:00 pm
Re: Count To Five
i have no idea what is most common.
if you buy one and want to use it with ct5 make sure you get what they are calling "stereo" with the TRS jack. otherwise no love.
also i am just finishing testing a small firmware update for the rev k's that went out which fixes the mode 2 transcendence issue (shrinking buffer), adds level control to mode 3 (can turn down each DIR independently) and also attempts to resolve something someone i think not from this board was able to demonstrate, which is in mode 3 the write head is not quite perfectly aligned with DIR 1 when at 1:1 forward and recording so if you try to use it as a "normal" looper to layer there is a slight doubling effect. i don't quite have the fingers that guy did but we have tried to theoretically improve this latency, so hopefully it works out.
if these are solid fixes we will release the parallel firmwares for h,i,j. so a bit of a detour on that.
if you have found any other bugs right with the rev k release now would be the best time to let me know. not a wish list, just problems vs what it was advertised to do plz.
s
if you buy one and want to use it with ct5 make sure you get what they are calling "stereo" with the TRS jack. otherwise no love.
also i am just finishing testing a small firmware update for the rev k's that went out which fixes the mode 2 transcendence issue (shrinking buffer), adds level control to mode 3 (can turn down each DIR independently) and also attempts to resolve something someone i think not from this board was able to demonstrate, which is in mode 3 the write head is not quite perfectly aligned with DIR 1 when at 1:1 forward and recording so if you try to use it as a "normal" looper to layer there is a slight doubling effect. i don't quite have the fingers that guy did but we have tried to theoretically improve this latency, so hopefully it works out.
if these are solid fixes we will release the parallel firmwares for h,i,j. so a bit of a detour on that.
if you have found any other bugs right with the rev k release now would be the best time to let me know. not a wish list, just problems vs what it was advertised to do plz.
s
-
- involved
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 3:23 am
Re: Count To Five
multi_s wrote:i have no idea what is most common.
if you buy one and want to use it with ct5 make sure you get what they are calling "stereo" with the TRS jack. otherwise no love.
also i am just finishing testing a small firmware update for the rev k's that went out which fixes the mode 2 transcendence issue (shrinking buffer), adds level control to mode 3 (can turn down each DIR independently) and also attempts to resolve something someone i think not from this board was able to demonstrate, which is in mode 3 the write head is not quite perfectly aligned with DIR 1 when at 1:1 forward and recording so if you try to use it as a "normal" looper to layer there is a slight doubling effect. i don't quite have the fingers that guy did but we have tried to theoretically improve this latency, so hopefully it works out.
if these are solid fixes we will release the parallel firmwares for h,i,j. so a bit of a detour on that.
if you have found any other bugs right with the rev k release now would be the best time to let me know. not a wish list, just problems vs what it was advertised to do plz.
s
Sweet heavens this sounds awesome!

You sir are a gentleman and a scholar
- pd~
- committed
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 1:04 am
Re: Count To Five
When the h/i/j update hits, will there be any significant difference between them and k? Got a j coming from a trade.
aka leaves turn - engineer with DigiTech/DOD
- multi_s
- IAMILF
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:00 pm
Re: Count To Five
pd~ wrote:When the h/i/j update hits, will there be any significant difference between them and k? Got a j coming from a trade.
functionally j shoudl be the same except you do not have "green" led hardware. h/i you will have to access things a bit differently.
rev k board has better a/d d/a but is otherwise functionally identical to rev j.
s
- humandingus
- committed
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:44 am
Re: Count To Five
multi_s wrote:i have no idea what is most common.
if you buy one and want to use it with ct5 make sure you get what they are calling "stereo" with the TRS jack. otherwise no love.
also i am just finishing testing a small firmware update for the rev k's that went out which fixes the mode 2 transcendence issue (shrinking buffer), adds level control to mode 3 (can turn down each DIR independently) and also attempts to resolve something someone i think not from this board was able to demonstrate, which is in mode 3 the write head is not quite perfectly aligned with DIR 1 when at 1:1 forward and recording so if you try to use it as a "normal" looper to layer there is a slight doubling effect. i don't quite have the fingers that guy did but we have tried to theoretically improve this latency, so hopefully it works out.
if these are solid fixes we will release the parallel firmwares for h,i,j. so a bit of a detour on that.
if you have found any other bugs right with the rev k release now would be the best time to let me know. not a wish list, just problems vs what it was advertised to do plz.
s
this all sounds fantastic!!! thank you! pretty much addresses all of the small issues i've had.
also, i'm expecting a 2nd CT5 in the mail today! can't wait to run two on my board at once. totally the most fun and useful pedal i've ever had.
- Cortex
- involved
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:16 am
Re: Count To Five
Fantastic to hear about the new firmware update that will give us volume control in mode 3! Thank you so much!!
Will the set volumes for different DIRs be remembered on mode change or even pedal power off? Both would be useful I think. I could see myself setting one set of volumes to use in 90% of situations and then rest of the time(I would probably tinker with it, but rarely.
Either way, fantastic that you're doing this.
Will the set volumes for different DIRs be remembered on mode change or even pedal power off? Both would be useful I think. I could see myself setting one set of volumes to use in 90% of situations and then rest of the time(I would probably tinker with it, but rarely.
Either way, fantastic that you're doing this.
- multi_s
- IAMILF
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:00 pm
Re: Count To Five
Cortex wrote:Fantastic to hear about the new firmware update that will give us volume control in mode 3! Thank you so much!!
Will the set volumes for different DIRs be remembered on mode change or even pedal power off? Both would be useful I think. I could see myself setting one set of volumes to use in 90% of situations and then rest of the time(I would probably tinker with it, but rarely.
Either way, fantastic that you're doing this.
when you flip modes it will keep the volume setting in mode 3 if you leave and come back. for power off/on i will add something so that you can save the power on default. this will save transcendence and q mode as well. so basically you set the pedal the way you want the default to be, store it, then if you change things, when you power cycle it will go back to the state you stored.
s
- goosekevin
- Supporter
- Posts: 2236
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:25 pm
- Location: NSW Australia
Re: Count To Five
multi_s wrote:Cortex wrote:Fantastic to hear about the new firmware update that will give us volume control in mode 3! Thank you so much!!
Will the set volumes for different DIRs be remembered on mode change or even pedal power off? Both would be useful I think. I could see myself setting one set of volumes to use in 90% of situations and then rest of the time(I would probably tinker with it, but rarely.
Either way, fantastic that you're doing this.
when you flip modes it will keep the volume setting in mode 3 if you leave and come back. for power off/on i will add something so that you can save the power on default. this will save transcendence and q mode as well. so basically you set the pedal the way you want the default to be, store it, then if you change things, when you power cycle it will go back to the state you stored.
s
this sounds really useful, will it be able to be applied to two switch models for the quantisation saving?
Derelict78 wrote:That probably sounds awful in the best possible way.
- multi_s
- IAMILF
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:00 pm
Re: Count To Five
yes but it will probably be a bit of switch gymnastics since they lack the Q switch.