Classic Player JM vs MIJ JM

Guitar and bass lounge at the Wang Bar.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

Post Reply
Faldoe

Classic Player JM vs MIJ JM

Post by Faldoe »

I was at GC earlier and played a Squier J Mascis JM and a Classic Player. The Mascis was pretty nice considering the price but the Classic Player had a fatter neck (which was surprising) and over all felt better. Thinner frets.

I had a 96' or so MIJ JM years ago and sold it. The neck was pretty thin, especially so compared to the CP JM I played today. Are MIJ JM necks usually thin? or did they very in thickness? If they're generally thin, I might lean towards getting a Classic Player.

Is there anything the MIJ has on the CP? The stock MIJ pickups were nothing special and I upgraded to Novaks and a Mastery Bridge.
User avatar
rfurtkamp
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 5778
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:27 am
Location: Idaho
Contact:

Re: Classic Player JM vs MIJ JM

Post by rfurtkamp »

The MIJ stuff is generally a thinner neck profile.

CP will be consistent, and what you get is what you get - if you like it, you'll be happy.

I love mine.

There's a *lot* of MIJ fanboys here though; I've never considered them worth a premium by any stretch.

Perspective, I vastly prefer my much cheaper MII Squier Mustang to the CIJ '69RI I have. The Japanese one looks better, has superior fit and finish, etc...but it doesn't sound as good, doesn't have that special thing that some guitars have.

The Mascis also comes with jumbo frets IIRC, the CP has standardish ones.
==
My pedalboard costs approximately 191 Metal Zones.

Image
Faldoe

Re: Classic Player JM vs MIJ JM

Post by Faldoe »

Thanks, rfurtkamp.

I've grown fond of thicker necks lately. The Mascis is great for the price, especially when buying used but the neck was a little too thin. I was surprised the CP neck was that thick. I figured from owning that MIJ JM I had, that JM necks were generally thin. I'll have to keep an eye out for a CP.
User avatar
rfurtkamp
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 5778
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:27 am
Location: Idaho
Contact:

Re: Classic Player JM vs MIJ JM

Post by rfurtkamp »

JM necks are rebadged Strat necks, always have been in profile etc.

Can get a baseball bat from time to time.

The CP stuff seems to be cut on the heftier side -my CP Jaguar has the biggest neck I've ever handled on a Jaguar or Mustang (same thing as above), and I'm actually pretty fond of it.
==
My pedalboard costs approximately 191 Metal Zones.

Image
User avatar
waltdogg
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:01 pm
Location: hell, ca

Re: Classic Player JM vs MIJ JM

Post by waltdogg »

Weird I thought the J. Mascis neck was one of the thicker necks I've played.
D.o.S. wrote:Why do people eat steak that shit is gross
behndy wrote: lol. she thinks Brazil is wayyyy too unsafe. but i got PLANS.
MechaGodzilla wrote:man, fuck those big neutrik plugs
User avatar
rfurtkamp
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 5778
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:27 am
Location: Idaho
Contact:

Re: Classic Player JM vs MIJ JM

Post by rfurtkamp »

Yea, the Squier one I have is pretty chunky.
==
My pedalboard costs approximately 191 Metal Zones.

Image
Faldoe

Re: Classic Player JM vs MIJ JM

Post by Faldoe »

Maybe I played an oddball. It wasn't the thinnest neck but the CP was definitely thicker.
User avatar
rfurtkamp
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 5778
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:27 am
Location: Idaho
Contact:

Re: Classic Player JM vs MIJ JM

Post by rfurtkamp »

I'd classify the CP as slightly bigger (TWSS), but neither is small.
==
My pedalboard costs approximately 191 Metal Zones.

Image
Post Reply