Let's talk about jacks...and a question to you builders

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
goroth
HERO
HERO
Posts: 13514
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:50 am
Location: Eurothrash: Frozen northern outpost.
Contact:

Re: Let's talk about jacks...and a question to you builders

Post by goroth »

D.o.S. wrote:Worth pointing out here that Goroth is a nerd with a crazy pedalboard for nerds.
This is not in fact untrue.

I still fail to see how anyone playing live would choose side mount.
Gone Fission wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:21 pm That’s quarter-assed at best.
Music out on all streaming services and bandcamp and what not.
Spotify /// Apple Music
My band /// Instagram ///Bandcamp ///
User avatar
Uncle Grandfather
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 8550
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:34 pm

Re: Let's talk about jacks...and a question to you builders

Post by Uncle Grandfather »

jwar wrote:
Uncle Grandfather wrote:tl;dr
pretty irrelevant to my interests with making music
Image
Cool story bro
Image
User avatar
CyaNitrate
experienced
experienced
Posts: 882
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:24 pm
Location: The Desert

Re: Let's talk about jacks...and a question to you builders

Post by CyaNitrate »

goroth wrote:I see no benefit to side mount jacks.

If you need to test a cable you have to remove the whole pedal to remove the cable.
Pedal fucks up live you just unplug then plug into the pedal beside. Side mount means you need a longer patch cable to make the jump to the next pedal (by virtue of geometry).
I've only used a pt Jr. and or pro, but all of my patch cables hang in the space between the slats allowing for cleaner routing. Not so with side mount.
When planning a board you don't have to build in any margin for jacks, allowing greater modulisation of a board when top mount.
It is more common to arrange pedals tightly laterally, than vertically. Thus it makes sense to use the vertical space for cabling.

Side mount can eat a dick.
Agreed. My board is tiered, the bottom row is flat, the second row is slightly angled. It started out Pedaltrain style, but this is easier for me to access the top row without hitting the knobs of the first row. I have both orientations, but prefer top mount, because like Goroth said, I have to arrange pedals tightly laterally, not vertically. Granted, I made the board with a ton of extra space (the fab tone and rat aren't even hooked up), and make my own patch cables, so its not that big of a deal.
board new.jpg
crochambeau wrote:Since we're talking about jacks, while I assent that I have somewhat converted (or at least have begun to) for the standard outgoing, I still DO NOT GET the input at right output at left preference.
I would guess this began as an American thing...We drive on the right, if you look at a building with two doors, typically you go in on the right, out on the left :idk:
But it definitely makes going in from one pedal to the next easier with them all being the same.
jwar wrote:BRO! There is only one order! Bass>fuzz>fuzz>fuzz>fuzz>overdriven amp. :)
goroth wrote:Come up here and fuzz party. Yes. Fuzz party. It is a legit verb.
User avatar
D.o.S.
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:47 am
Location: Ewe-Kay

Re: Let's talk about jacks...and a question to you builders

Post by D.o.S. »

goroth wrote:
D.o.S. wrote:Worth pointing out here that Goroth is a nerd with a crazy pedalboard for nerds.
This is not in fact untrue.

I still fail to see how anyone playing live would choose side mount.
If you don't have a pedalboard (say you're using only 2-3 pedals) then sidemounted jacks make the pedals fall more naturally next to each other.

Check and Mate.
good deals are here.
flesh couch is here.
UglyCasanova wrote: It's not the expensive programs you use, it's the way you click and drag.
Achtane wrote:
comesect2.0 wrote:Michael Jackson king tut little Richard in your butt.
IT'S THE ENNNND OF THE WORRRLD AS WE KNOW IT
User avatar
DADGBD
experienced
experienced
Posts: 624
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 8:45 pm
Location: Ontario CANADA
Contact:

Re: Let's talk about jacks...and a question to you builders

Post by DADGBD »

What the man said.
goroth wrote:I see no benefit to side mount jacks.

If you need to test a cable you have to remove the whole pedal to remove the cable.
Pedal fucks up live you just unplug then plug into the pedal beside. Side mount means you need a longer patch cable to make the jump to the next pedal (by virtue of geometry).
I've only used a pt Jr. and or pro, but all of my patch cables hang in the space between the slats allowing for cleaner routing. Not so with side mount.
When planning a board you don't have to build in any margin for jacks, allowing greater modulisation of a board when top mount.
It is more common to arrange pedals tightly laterally, than vertically. Thus it makes sense to use the vertical space for cabling.

Side mount can eat a dick.
User avatar
goroth
HERO
HERO
Posts: 13514
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:50 am
Location: Eurothrash: Frozen northern outpost.
Contact:

Re: Let's talk about jacks...and a question to you builders

Post by goroth »

D.o.S. wrote:
goroth wrote:
D.o.S. wrote:Worth pointing out here that Goroth is a nerd with a crazy pedalboard for nerds.
This is not in fact untrue.

I still fail to see how anyone playing live would choose side mount.
If you don't have a pedalboard (say you're using only 2-3 pedals) then sidemounted jacks make the pedals fall more naturally next to each other.

Check and Mate.
I would never play live with more than one pedal and no pedal board.
1. Odds of kicking out a pedal/cable/dc cable are massively increased when they are just laying on the floor.
2. It is pro as fuck to just plug in two cables and then rock n roll. I hate seeing bands dick around with pedals on the floor.
Gone Fission wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:21 pm That’s quarter-assed at best.
Music out on all streaming services and bandcamp and what not.
Spotify /// Apple Music
My band /// Instagram ///Bandcamp ///
User avatar
SquareWaveFuzz
committed
committed
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 2:57 pm
Location: Portsmouth, U.K.

Re: Let's talk about jacks...and a question to you builders

Post by SquareWaveFuzz »

Much prefer top mounted jacks, but try fitting 2 1/4" jacks and a power jack on the top face of a 1590b, difficult as fuck.
D.o.S. wrote:What the fuck? You're fucking English how do you not like Pink Floyd? Disastrous dude, cultural depravity at its worst
User avatar
rfurtkamp
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 5774
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:27 am
Location: Idaho
Contact:

Re: Let's talk about jacks...and a question to you builders

Post by rfurtkamp »

goroth wrote: I still fail to see how anyone playing live would choose side mount.
I don't these days, obviously, but I preferred side back in the day. Little bit of room between each pedal for the plugs worked just fine because I have very large feet (14 double-wide) even before the lymphedema set in.

I have both on my board these days but the joke is it's irrelevant with daisy chained power,since the power jacks are never in a place that's the same on any pedal anyway.
==
My pedalboard costs approximately 191 Metal Zones.

Image
User avatar
Pete
experienced
experienced
Posts: 759
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 11:42 pm
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Re: Let's talk about jacks...and a question to you builders

Post by Pete »

It doesn't make a difference to me. All of the pedals on my board are side mounted, except for two that are top mounted. I made it work. I am grateful that input is right side and output is right side for most pedals. I like having standardized spots for input and output, because it would be a real pain if every pedal were different.
User avatar
rfurtkamp
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 5774
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:27 am
Location: Idaho
Contact:

Re: Let's talk about jacks...and a question to you builders

Post by rfurtkamp »

Yep, it is.

Fender Blender I'm looking at you!
==
My pedalboard costs approximately 191 Metal Zones.

Image
User avatar
repoman
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2291
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2015 3:16 pm
Location: Edge City

Re: Let's talk about jacks...and a question to you builders

Post by repoman »

face mounted jack is best mounted jack

Image

if all pedals had face mounted jacks we could pretend we are as cool as modular synthers
F U T U R E G A M E R
User avatar
rfurtkamp
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 5774
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:27 am
Location: Idaho
Contact:

Re: Let's talk about jacks...and a question to you builders

Post by rfurtkamp »

I am cooler than modular synthers.

I believe in the 19" format!
==
My pedalboard costs approximately 191 Metal Zones.

Image
User avatar
Jwar
Cosmic of BILF
Cosmic of BILF
Posts: 18239
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: The edge of existence

Re: Let's talk about jacks...and a question to you builders

Post by Jwar »

I honestly think face mounted jacks is the winner. If I wasn't sooooooooooooooo lazy. I rehouse a ton of my stuff with them just to prove the point. But like I said, if I WASN'T so lazy. lol
"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".

-JWAR :)
User avatar
indianDYsummer
committed
committed
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 8:28 pm

Re: Let's talk about jacks...and a question to you builders

Post by indianDYsummer »

I don't like the concept of face mounted jacks. Unless you cut your own sized patch cables, that shit be floppin' all over yo knobs, trippin' up yo dancing. For real. :!!!: :idk:

How about bottom mounted jacks? And get a pedaltrain with infinitely thin slats. Your pedals will basically levitate with no visible wires at all!
User avatar
Dark Barn
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1801
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:12 am

Re: Let's talk about jacks...and a question to you builders

Post by Dark Barn »

I like some room too. I usually don't smush pedals together even when they have top jacks unless they are huge ass pedals. But I never want to have to worry about precision when stomping on a switch. So yeah top jacks/side jacks doesn't matter to me.
I've been searchin' for the dolphins in the sea.

The Weak in Review: Weak Arguments Revue
Post Reply