SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function

Jwar · Post by **Jwar** » Tue Jan 05, 2016 10:24 am

It has five fucking jacks! LOL!! Good luck getting that EHX rehoused! hahahaha. For real though. That would be a nightmare. You could put all the jacks on top in a deep enclosure but your cables would be all over each other and destroy any space saving benefits.

The Ditto x2 I have NO clue about. I'm also interested in a looper with reverse but I tend to pull my looper off board now. It's just easier for me. Plus I don't play out, so it doesn't matter if it fits.

I think your best bet will be a non standard looper like Jean suggested.

Strange Tales · Post by **Strange Tales** » Tue Jan 05, 2016 10:28 am

D.o.S. wrote:That said I was messing with the patchulator and briefly wished all my pedals had top mounted jacks. I promptly flagellated myself for an hour in penance.

Welcome to the dark side. True bypass looping and top mounted jacks for everyone.

Jwar · Post by **Jwar** » Tue Jan 05, 2016 10:36 am

I honestly do not like having all top mounted jacks. I still don't get that, but to each their own.

Strange Tales · Post by **Strange Tales** » Tue Jan 05, 2016 10:43 am

There really isn't an actual reason for them in my eyes. You save a tiny bit of space if you're using pancake cables only. I guess if you're using regular sized cables and you have a PT Pro board you can fit one extra 125b enclosure pedal with the space you save.

goroth · Post by **goroth** » Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:10 pm

It makes trouble shooting so much easier though. You don't have to remove the pedals beside to remove the cables. Easier to hide/route cables as well.

hbombgraphics · Post by **hbombgraphics** » Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:21 pm

top mounted jacks make everything look so clean and nice

would love a small looper with reverse
kinda bummed the reverse on the 4500 isn't footswitchable
if it was I would make room for it somehow

tremolo3 · Post by **tremolo3** » Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:23 pm

The Solo XT is not that big...

hbombgraphics · Post by **hbombgraphics** » Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:24 pm

ramonovski wrote:The Solo XT is not that big...

true, but how do you switch to reverse?

Inconuucl · Post by **Inconuucl** » Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:25 pm

Loopers have become hugely popular. Wait for namm?

hbombgraphics · Post by **hbombgraphics** » Tue Jan 05, 2016 5:30 pm

Inconuucl wrote:Loopers have become hugely popular. Wait for namm?

I am sure there is a some new very cool stuff out there

kinda wish a cool builder would take a stab at one
like EQD or BOE or someone

elevenstrings · Post by **elevenstrings** » Tue Jan 05, 2016 10:01 pm

I save a ton of space with top jacks.

Sidejacks is the first thing that kills gas... unless I really can't get that sound through anything else.... I'm running about 36 pedals at once right now, only 3 of them have sidejacks (2x Revolvers & Miku).

But yeah on topic, I hope there are some tricked-out looper announcing at NAMM or I'm gonna go ahead and design my own.

neonblack · Post by **neonblack** » Tue Jan 05, 2016 11:51 pm

DONT TEASE US JEAN

space6oy · Post by **space6oy** » Tue Jan 05, 2016 11:53 pm

elevenstrings wrote:I'm running about 36 pedals at once right now

you've probably already shared a pic somewhere in the thread but i wanna see this.

terminalvertigo · Post by **terminalvertigo** » Wed Jan 06, 2016 12:50 am

jwar wrote:I honestly do not like having all top mounted jacks. I still don't get that, but to each their own.

elevenstrings · Post by **elevenstrings** » Wed Jan 06, 2016 2:02 am

space6oy wrote:
elevenstrings wrote:I'm running about 36 pedals at once right now
you've probably already shared a pic somewhere in the thread but i wanna see this.

I don't think I've posted a proper board pic since last year's BILF. It's basically mutated into this:

ilovefuzz.com

SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function

Re: SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function

Re: SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function

Re: SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function

Re: SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function

Re: SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function

Re: SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function

Re: SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function

Re: SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function

Re: SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function

Re: SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function

Re: SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function

Re: SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function

Re: SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function

Re: SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function

Re: SMALLEST looper WITH reverse function