That snippet of conversation is from the infamous Refused thread where I started arguing with everybody. It was interesting because I was thinking about how different people hear different things in music. For example, to D.o.S., Sufjan Stevens is "twee," whereas I had literally never thought of Sufjan as being "twee." Perspective is everything. And that got me thinking about how people are looking for fundamentally different things in music.D.o.S. wrote:I don't typically make melodicism a central point of the music I listen to, and the more singer-songerwiter-y stuff just makes me wonder why I'm not listening to Elliot Smith. also this sort of "twee" music makes me gag.casecandy wrote:Fair enough, but did you ever listen to him/it, or just arbitrarily decide not to listen to...? How did you arrive at this conclusion?D.o.S. wrote:You're conflating: I don't hate Sufjan Stevens -- I don't listen to Sufjan Stevens. It's not worth listening to. Hence "unessential."
For example, my wife will remember all the lyrics to songs, but not necessarily the melody; for me, melody is the most engaging aspect of music. For example, once she walked in one me singing along to "27" by Biffy Clyro, "I still feel the pain in my heart." And she asked me, "Do you even relate to most of the music you listen to?", making reference to the fact that I'm a pretty happy person who listens to sadsack emo music. And I said, "Well, the lyrics don't really matter, it's the melody and the way he's delivering the line that really drive it home." Which explains the popularity of Sigur Ros (and why she's not a fan), or why I can rock out to Boris without knowing a word of Japanese.
So... having established that people are really looking for different things from music... what are YOU listening for? What kind of music hooks you? What does music have to do successfully to hook you? I wanna see. Choose up to three things from the list above... and then let's talk about it







