flipping in advance of a future version
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2021 12:53 pm
So Source Audio showed off a populated PCB for something along the development lifecycle of a Reflex v.2 on social media this week. They’ve said that this will happen as a treadle-less pedal (bring your own expression pedal) with an ability to deal with some absurdly hot CV from some modular synth gear that the OG couldn’t handle.
Naturally, this means that the scarcity pricing of the original is being kept by a handful of new listings, probably because they figure they can get the same function and cash if they wait.
It’s kind of like people flipping their Cooper FX stuff when Tom joined Chase Bliss for “no more Cooper FX” prices when a future Gen Loss product was already announced. Or flipping Bliss Factories when they knew there was a new colorway coming.
This makes economic sense but seems gross to me. Preying on the uninformed, of course, but it feel like it’s on the continuum to keeping instruments in vaults unplayed. Maybe I’m weird, probably dumb, but I’m holding onto my Reflex, Gen Loss, and Bliss Factory. Am I doing this wrong?
Naturally, this means that the scarcity pricing of the original is being kept by a handful of new listings, probably because they figure they can get the same function and cash if they wait.
It’s kind of like people flipping their Cooper FX stuff when Tom joined Chase Bliss for “no more Cooper FX” prices when a future Gen Loss product was already announced. Or flipping Bliss Factories when they knew there was a new colorway coming.
This makes economic sense but seems gross to me. Preying on the uninformed, of course, but it feel like it’s on the continuum to keeping instruments in vaults unplayed. Maybe I’m weird, probably dumb, but I’m holding onto my Reflex, Gen Loss, and Bliss Factory. Am I doing this wrong?