ilovefuzz.com

Anyone here use it? Like it? Love it? Hate it? Want to convince me to buy one, or not buy one?

Errant Tiger wrote:Anyone here use it? Like it? Love it? Hate it? Want to convince me to buy one, or not buy one?

had to google it because i didn't even knew what it was (i supposed it was a new addition in the EHX canyon series).
ONly thing i can say is that it seems a cool pedal but usually i avoid multiple effects combos because most of the times i like only one of those and end up not using the others at all. I'd reather grab a separate OD+rev+DELAY.

Dowi wrote:

Errant Tiger wrote:Anyone here use it? Like it? Love it? Hate it? Want to convince me to buy one, or not buy one?

had to google it because i didn't even knew what it was (i supposed it was a new addition in the EHX canyon series).
ONly thing i can say is that it seems a cool pedal but usually i avoid multiple effects combos because most of the times i like only one of those and end up not using the others at all. I'd reather grab a separate OD+rev+DELAY.

I usually do, for the same reason. But I've been on a vaguely-more-minimalist kick lately, and I'm about to come into a little bit of extra money, so I started thinking...

All the effects sound good, though I'm not sure how I feel about the verb into delay.

that bad?

...

oh, I see.

idk know about those footswitches - seems like you'd need some pointy shoes....

Dandolin wrote:that bad?

That's the Noveller pedal, whose music I am very fond of.

It's expensive, and it's mono. And I have considered the idea more than a few times.

spacelordmother wrote:

I don't quite follow.

manymanyhaha wrote:That's the Noveller pedal, whose music I am very fond of.

It's expensive, and it's mono. And I have considered the idea more than a few times.

Yeah, to all three of those. Hence my post!

Errant Tiger wrote:I don't quite follow.

I find it exceedingly unattractive.

spacelordmother wrote:

Errant Tiger wrote:I don't quite follow.

I find it exceedingly unattractive.

Now I understand. Took me a minute.

I like the moon but not the rest so much. Better than the Turd Fuzz or whatever. Still, if it worked, I could overlook the looks.

Errant Tiger wrote:

spacelordmother wrote:

Errant Tiger wrote:I don't quite follow.

I find it exceedingly unattractive.

Now I understand. Took me a minute.

I like the moon but not the rest so much. Better than the Turd Fuzz or whatever. Still, if it worked, I could overlook the looks.

Have no fear though. Long ago some wonderful person invented the sand paper.

Blackened Soul wrote:

Errant Tiger wrote:

spacelordmother wrote:

Errant Tiger wrote:I don't quite follow.

I find it exceedingly unattractive.

Now I understand. Took me a minute.

I like the moon but not the rest so much. Better than the Turd Fuzz or whatever. Still, if it worked, I could overlook the looks.

Have no fear though. Long ago some wonderful person invented the sand paper.

And the duct tape, and the sharpie.

I like the idea of this, I even built my own ridiculous multi-pedal a long time ago by rehousing a handful of my favorite effects into one enormous enclosure. This is probably something I’ll never actually purchase. The artwork’s great and the concept good, there’s no way I’d ever agree on which effects to stick in that enclosure.

they say the reverb is just a belton brick. the delay is digital voiced to sound analog, so probably fv1-based. the overdrive is "transparent" and "dynamic". seems to cover the same ground as a ton of existing boutique effects...

honestly, I'd just get a used Boss OD3, LS2, DD5/DD7, and RV3/RV5. wayyyy more options and still cheaper.