Page 1 of 1

Yamaha SPX-90

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2016 9:38 pm
by SonicReducer
The undisputed 'shoegaze' rack, I have recently inherited one from my brother and want to use it as part of my live rack.. just some quick questions regarding it

[*] Are there any 'modern' pedals that emulate it (has anyone developed one?)
[*] Are there any cheap footswitches for it? Are there footswitches that let you select saved presets?
[*] Does anyone do mods on them (in Australia preferably) ?? They are tone-suckers, would a buffer before it work?

Thanks!

Re: Yamaha SPX-90

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2016 10:01 pm
by psychic vampire.
Point 1 - No clue. None that i know of, but possibly. There are definitely things that fill similar roles, everyone always recommends the Zoom MS70CDR
Point 2 - If it has a footswitch input, i imagine any one would do? You could probably find just any odd footswitch. No clue about preset recall from a switch, how exactly that would work.
Point 3 - Put it in an FX Loop?

Re: Yamaha SPX-90

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2016 11:18 pm
by Gone Fission
Magicstomp is the pedal equivalent, but still does some tone suck.

A bypass looper can help with old rack stuff. Best option with most old rack stuff is a mixer so you can run the signal fully wet in parallel to your unfucked dry signal.

Alternately, try to find a deal on some stereo-chorus solid state combo amp with dual line ins and run your fully wet processor tapped off a preamp out of your main amp and voila, wet/dry/wet.

Re: Yamaha SPX-90

Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2016 11:47 pm
by SonicReducer
Gone Fission wrote:Magicstomp is the pedal equivalent, but still does some tone suck.

A bypass looper can help with old rack stuff. Best option with most old rack stuff is a mixer so you can run the signal fully wet in parallel to your unfucked dry signal.

Alternately, try to find a deal on some stereo-chorus solid state combo amp with dual line ins and run your fully wet processor tapped off a preamp out of your main amp and voila, wet/dry/wet.
yes but does it have the same 'tone'???

Re: Yamaha SPX-90

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2016 12:45 am
by Gone Fission
I've never done a head to head, but it sounds like the 90 does on records and most people who have tried both seem to think they sound the same. The early reflections, reverse gate, and symphonic algorithms seem balls on. I don't know the original Pitch C algorithm well, but guys into 80s L.A. studio rack of schlock stuff think the Magicstomp gets that one right, too.

Re: Yamaha SPX-90

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:42 am
by SonicReducer
Magicstomps are out of production, so,techincally there is no,similar pedal..anyway thanks for the info, i need a footswitch right now :!!!:

Re: Yamaha SPX-90

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 9:49 am
by rfurtkamp
Footswitch should be standard Echoplex type IIRC.

It selects on/off or patch advance based on settings I believe (it's been YEARS since I handled one).

The other thing is to put it before the right amp. They sound like ass in front of something dirty; they want to see clean.

And for those who didn't have one fall on their laps, and you don't need *rack* per se, and are happy with amptop, look for a REX-50.

Re: Yamaha SPX-90

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 7:58 pm
by penelope tree
The Zoom Multistomp pedals are good for Shoegaze but I wouldn't recommend one to emulate specific Yamaha algorithms. The early reflections effect, for instance, does not sound much like the SPX's equivalent and I don't think there is a Zoom equivalent of Symphonic.