Page 1 of 1
The Swine Flu Pandemic: Fact Or Fiction?
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 10:06 am
by 1,2,3, Pull Out!
It's long but I seriously urge EVERYONE to read this:
http://endgamenow.com/pandemic-bio-weapons/critical-alert-the-swine-flu-pandemic-%E2%80%93-fact-or-fiction/more likely to die from a lightning strike? Somethings wrong here...
Re: The Swine Flu Pandemic: Fact Or Fiction?
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 11:00 am
by Gunner Recall
The media blew it out of proportion, as they do with everything.
I think the government is acting appropriately considering we don't know everything about this strain of flu just yet.
I think the flu vaccine is useless, but it makes people feel safe, just like that stupid color coded terrorism chart
or the millions wasted on daily fighter jet flybys in NYC or the insanity that is the patriot act.
People are stupid and want to feel safe regardless of the cost.
I can't help but feel uneasy about the popularity of a figure like Ron Paul.
He parades as a revolutionary educating the massses but he himself is most likely a member of the freemasons
and whatever secret society which already control the government.
His father, wife, and daughters all belong to masonic organizations and he's never outright denied it
The info is out there, you can draw your own conclusions.
Not saying the freemasons are plotting an evil NWO with Ron Paul at the head, but consider he seems to be positioned very much like a lightning rod at the moment.
Re: The Swine Flu Pandemic: Fact Or Fiction?
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 12:33 pm
by Ghost Hip
Yeah, the media is pretty ridiculous. Since their goal is to keep people watching, over-exposing a flu is a pretty easy way to do so. Even just by watching shows like the daily show you can see how idiotic and repetitive the media is. "How would you grade Obama's 1st 100 days in office?"

Re: The Swine Flu Pandemic: Fact Or Fiction?
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 12:44 pm
by metalmariachi
The prime objectives of the news media is fear and ensuring contamination of jury pools.
It's almost impossible for any one to get a fair trial now with the media coverage slanted to reflect their views on the defendants guilt or innocence.
Resent teasers.
“Storm collapses roof in Texas, are killer storms coming here?”.
“Swine Flue kills 10 in Mexico, are you at risk?”.
Then we have Katy Curric and Chris Mathews having orgasm every time they say “Obama”.
MM
BTW; Ron Paul (“smaller government, less spending”) threw the most pork into the stimulus package.
Re: The Swine Flu Pandemic: Fact Or Fiction?
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 1:16 pm
by 1,2,3, Pull Out!
morningstaru wrote:The media blew it out of proportion, as they do with everything.
I think the government is acting appropriately considering we don't know everything about this strain of flu just yet.
I think the flu vaccine is useless, but it makes people feel safe, just like that stupid color coded terrorism chart
or the millions wasted on daily fighter jet flybys in NYC or the insanity that is the patriot act.
People are stupid and want to feel safe regardless of the cost.
I can't help but feel uneasy about the popularity of a figure like Ron Paul.
He parades as a revolutionary educating the massses but he himself is most likely a member of the freemasons
and whatever secret society which already control the government.
His father, wife, and daughters all belong to masonic organizations and he's never outright denied it
The info is out there, you can draw your own conclusions.
Not saying the freemasons are plotting an evil NWO with Ron Paul at the head, but consider he seems to be positioned very much like a lightning rod at the moment.
Originally found the article on the doctor's personal website, but it got deleted for some reason, that's why I turned to Ron Paul.
Re: The Swine Flu Pandemic: Fact Or Fiction?
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 3:43 pm
by bigchiefbc
morningstaru wrote:I can't help but feel uneasy about the popularity of a figure like Ron Paul.
He parades as a revolutionary educating the massses but he himself is most likely a member of the freemasons
and whatever secret society which already control the government.
His father, wife, and daughters all belong to masonic organizations and he's never outright denied it
The info is out there, you can draw your own conclusions.
Not saying the freemasons are plotting an evil NWO with Ron Paul at the head, but consider he seems to be positioned very much like a lightning rod at the moment.
Not to get all crazy political here, but my main problem with Ron Paul is this:
In a December 2003 article entitled "Christmas in Secular America", Paul wrote, "The notion of a rigid separation between church and state has no basis in either the text of the Constitution or the writings of our Founding Fathers. On the contrary, our Founders’ political views were strongly informed by their religious beliefs. Certainly the drafters of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, both replete with references to God, would be aghast at the federal government’s hostility to religion. The establishment clause of the First Amendment was simply intended to forbid the creation of an official state church like the Church of England, not to drive religion out of public life. The Founding Fathers envisioned a robustly Christian yet religiously tolerant America, with churches serving as vital institutions that would eclipse the state in importance. Throughout our nation’s history, churches have done what no government can ever do, namely teach morality and civility. Moral and civil individuals are largely governed by their own sense of right and wrong, and hence have little need for external government. This is the real reason the collectivist Left hates religion: Churches as institutions compete with the state for the people’s allegiance, and many devout people put their faith in God before putting their faith in the state. Knowing this, the secularists wage an ongoing war against religion, chipping away bit by bit at our nation’s Christian heritage. Christmas itself may soon be a casualty of that war."
Eek. Don't like.
Re: The Swine Flu Pandemic: Fact Or Fiction?
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 4:12 pm
by 1,2,3, Pull Out!
I didn't even know anything about him until this post. Now I do. Don't like him either.
Their: now the link has no connection to Ron Paul
Re: The Swine Flu Pandemic: Fact Or Fiction?
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 5:01 pm
by silver hammer
I'm writing an article for the school newspaper about how the media is blowing it out of proportion. Fighting back at the local level ftw?

Re: The Swine Flu Pandemic: Fact Or Fiction?
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 5:45 pm
by 1,2,3, Pull Out!
Cancer caused by lack of vitamin D kills more people every year than skin cancer. Where's your sunblock and ridiculous hats and sunglasses now?
I can back that up if anyone wants me to. I'm juts too lazy right now.
Re: The Swine Flu Pandemic: Fact Or Fiction?
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 7:02 pm
by FuzzHugger
I think the problem is, more than any sinister shadow government pulling strings, is a dumbed-down sensationalist media that thrives on making people think they need to watch them, making people believe that at any moment they could die, be killed, or become a millionaire.
Re: The Swine Flu Pandemic: Fact Or Fiction?
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 8:24 pm
by Blurillaz
I thought the reason more people died in Mexico than the us was because they don't go to the doctor, or don't get there fast.

Re: The Swine Flu Pandemic: Fact Or Fiction?
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 11:21 pm
by metalmariachi
harsh words for a stuffed cat.
I did take 4 slots, but only one will stay with me.
MM
Re: The Swine Flu Pandemic: Fact Or Fiction?
Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 5:30 pm
by Blurillaz
Re: fictionalized reality
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 1:53 pm
by tio makeke
During that time, mexico congress passed a law against drug "small retailers":
anyone can carry:
2gr of opium
50 mg of heroine
5 gr of mariguana
500 mg of cocaine
0.015 mg of LSD
40 gr of meth
im not against drug use, thats within the free will of any person... but do you believe that government hasn't flagged every major criminal in it's country? do you think that being an elected politician is exempt of connections with organized crime? all the things that legalizing means to a country of the 3rd world (yes, you read correctly, "in ways of development" is politically correct bullshit) on the long run the cure becomes worse than the illness. but why not start with the heads of organized crime? now on top of that this laws also passed:
if an investigation requires it, this measures can be taken:
police agents undercovered as civilians
phone taping
federal police can check emails
private corporations have to give up personal info about their clients
all public comunication services can be surveilled in order to prevent
HOW MANY VIOLATED CIVIL RIGHTS CAN YOU COUNT? Are you afraid to see your political, religious or ideological leaders taken into custody? far worse, to walk out without a trial?
in mexico, kidnapping has taken a toll higher than swine flu and many times active or former policemen have being involved, now with this measures a cop can flip his baseball cap and sides at the same time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvG0gbvZ4tYps: or maybe i just see it backwards... i want a coke...