Page 1 of 1
What is the ideal behind the bridge string length
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 12:26 am
by Chankgeez
... for doom?

Re: What is the ideal behind the bridge string length
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 12:33 am
by kosta
Twice the distance from the nut to the bridge for the octave down loooooooooooooooows. Come on dude, that's BTB Doom 101.
Re: What is the ideal behind the bridge string length
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 12:54 am
by Achtane
The length must be such that three (3) dank nugs and a beard hair grown for at least five (5) years will fill its span.
Re: What is the ideal behind the bridge string length
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 2:43 am
by AxAxSxS
beard hair lengthwise? Or width?
Because science.
Re: What is the ideal behind the bridge string length
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2014 10:21 pm
by Chankgeez
AxAxSxS wrote:
Because science.
Re: What is the ideal behind the bridge string length
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 1:21 am
by Achtane
Doesn't matter how wide the bridge is because I'm p sure you only need one string for doom

Re: What is the ideal behind the bridge string length
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 8:03 am
by Twangasaurus
I thought the important part was to seal a couple of smooshed up sausage rolls inside the pickup cavities and glaze the fretboard in bbq sauce. Comin' over all meat machine.
Re: What is the ideal behind the bridge string length
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 9:05 am
by kaeth
Take the string distance from nut to bridge, and then derive what fraction of that will fit on the body you're using with the largest possible numerator, and lowest possible denominator, with the denominator taking precedence.
In order, these should give you the greatest resonance of the lowest possible harmonics. I think.
1/1, 1/2, 2/3, 1/3, 3/4, 1/4, 4/5, 3/5, 2/5, 1/5, 5/6, 1/6, etc
Re: What is the ideal behind the bridge string length
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 9:54 am
by spacelordmother
kaeth wrote:Take the string distance from nut to bridge, and then derive what fraction of that will fit on the body you're using with the largest possible numerator, and lowest possible denominator, with the denominator taking precedence.
In order, these should give you the greatest resonance of the lowest possible harmonics. I think.
1/1, 1/2, 2/3, 1/3, 3/4, 1/4, 4/5, 3/5, 2/5, 1/5, 5/6, 1/6, etc
My next doom harmonics album is going to be called "The Denominator Taking Precedence."
Re: What is the ideal behind the bridge string length
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 10:13 am
by Chankgeez
Fibonacci'd
Re: What is the ideal behind the bridge string length
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 12:28 pm
by kbit
kaeth wrote:Take the string distance from nut to bridge, and then derive what fraction of that will fit on the body you're using with the largest possible numerator, and lowest possible denominator, with the denominator taking precedence.
In order, these should give you the greatest resonance of the lowest possible harmonics. I think.
1/1, 1/2, 2/3, 1/3, 3/4, 1/4, 4/5, 3/5, 2/5, 1/5, 5/6, 1/6, etc

Re: What is the ideal behind the bridge string length
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 8:56 pm
by gunslinger_burrito
This is why I love this place.
Re: What is the ideal behind the bridge string length
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:17 pm
by Chankgeez
Thanks for bumping this, g_b, I totally forgot about this thread.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46Ce5QVcyuk[/youtube]
Re: What is the ideal behind the bridge string length
Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 6:14 pm
by gunslinger_burrito

Word.
