Page 1 of 3

Is it worth having a Super Fuzz (standard clone) and a FZ-2?

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:32 pm
by ThurberMingus
Title says it all. I have a SuperFuzz clone on the way and I just saw the Hyper Fuzz in the B/S/T so I was considering trading my currently unused HM-2 for it. Talk me into or out of it ILF. I'm depending on you.

Re: Is it worth having a Super Fuzz (standard clone) and a H

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 11:02 pm
by Chankgeez
I think you should do it. You're not using the HM-2, there's nothing to lose.

Re: Is it worth having a Super Fuzz (standard clone) and a H

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2014 11:36 pm
by ThurberMingus
My only reservation is that the HM-2 is the best sounding pedal on my bass, but if I miss it too much I think there are a few available locally. How's the Hyper Fuzz on bass?

Re: Is it worth having a Super Fuzz (standard clone) and a F

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 8:50 am
by GAS KING
A true superfuzz or like a VooDoo Labs SuperFuzz (Bosstone)?

I have a FZ-2, and it's nasty.
While awesome, I can't really see myself using it live.

Re: Is it worth having a Super Fuzz (standard clone) and a F

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:46 am
by friendship
I wouldn't do it. I'd rather have two different types of pedals than two pedals of the same ilk.

Re: Is it worth having a Super Fuzz (standard clone) and a F

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:53 am
by ThurberMingus
GAS KING wrote:A true superfuzz or like a VooDoo Labs SuperFuzz (Bosstone)?

I have a FZ-2, and it's nasty.
While awesome, I can't really see myself using it live.
A SuperFuzz like a Univox clone. I think I'll hold off for now, maybe see if he's interested in something else I've got. Thanks for helping me fend off the urges guys!

Re: Is it worth having a Super Fuzz (standard clone) and a F

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:40 am
by D.o.S.
what the fuck is this bullshit.

We're enablers, not naysayers.

Re: Is it worth having a Super Fuzz (standard clone) and a F

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:52 am
by ThurberMingus
D.o.S. wrote:what the fuck is this bullshit.

We're enablers, not naysayers.
This is the exact reply I was expecting. I'm really torn, on one hand my HM-2 is a beloved beast, on the other hand, people have been raving about the FZ-2 lately. My IC Muff just itches the scratch for thick gnarly fuzz. If I miss it too much I can get another HM-2 locally... I think I've gotta do it.

Re: Is it worth having a Super Fuzz (standard clone) and a F

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:14 am
by jrmy
D.o.S. wrote:what the fuck is this bullshit.

We're enablers, not naysayers.
Exactly. I'm gonna go one step further: get the Hyper Fuzz, and then get an IdiotBox Dungeon Master to replace the HM-2.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntkfO5iFQuw[/youtube]

That's the ILF way to do it.

Re: Is it worth having a Super Fuzz (standard clone) and a F

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:34 am
by GAS KING
I was just being the voice of reason. :saint:

Suppose it depends on what you're doing......or if this is just an adventure in GAS.

The HM-2 is way more practical and sounds good.
The FZ-2 is crazy.....either too many much mids or too many little mids....boost is cool though.
The Verellen Big Spider is similar, but not nearly as octavey glitchy digitally nasty as the FZ-2.

Re: Is it worth having a Super Fuzz (standard clone) and a F

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:04 pm
by ThurberMingus
How does the FZ-2 compare to the SuperFuzz in terms of wildness?

Re: Is it worth having a Super Fuzz (standard clone) and a F

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:11 pm
by WeHuntKings
Fz-2 fucking RULES on bass, just so you know.

Re: Is it worth having a Super Fuzz (standard clone) and a F

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 2:39 pm
by BitchPudding
jrmy wrote:
D.o.S. wrote:what the fuck is this bullshit.

We're enablers, not naysayers.
Exactly. I'm gonna go one step further: get the Hyper Fuzz, and then get an IdiotBox Dungeon Master to replace the HM-2.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntkfO5iFQuw[/youtube]

That's the ILF way to do it.
+1 for DM. The HEAVIEST pedal I've ever had the fortune to play. Theres a tourbox right now for the Idiot box stuff with this in it, maybe see if you can get in on that if its not too late Thurber?

Re: Is it worth having a Super Fuzz (standard clone) and a F

Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 4:36 pm
by ThurberMingus
Unfortunately I don't think I've been around long enough to quality for tour box action. I'm leaving to jam with a friend right now, bringing my beloved Rat/IC Muff combo pedal and the HM-2 (and my Blue Box) as my dirt sources. This will be the final test. Depending on how awesome the HM-2 sounds at reasonable levels and how much I want to step on it next to the Muff, its fate will be determined.

Re: Is it worth having a Super Fuzz (standard clone) and a F

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2014 8:37 am
by frigid midget
I actually a/b'd my FZ-2 with a Wattson FY-6 clone, which is probably one of the closest Superfuzz clones out there as far as I know of.

Sold the Wattson in a heartbeat. Great superfuzz clone and all, but the FZ-2 is just beefierwilderbiggerlowernastier. More gain, more balls, a little less octavy/klangy, if that makes any sense at all. Impo it's not worth getting both a superfuzz clone as well as an FZ-2, unless maybe if you're in a 60's garageband and want a seperate board for your dooù/slude/trash band.

If you can't just keep 'em all, just sell the HM-2. They're easy enough availble in case you regret the decision later on and want to get another one.