ilovefuzz.com

how do yall like to do it

M5 with volume sensitivity.

Live or recording?

I use a Dr Scientist Tremolessence. Works pretty well, but the only hassle is that you need to buy a TRS to TS splitter cable.

shit sosry


im talkin about recording and mixing and whatnot

last recording i did had rhythm and lead panned hard to their own side. i think it turned out well.

Mono all day.

i like panning 2 takes of the same thign hard left and hard right respectively
but if u poop it down to mono it might sound like the world's cheapest flanger

Hard left, hard right, middle. For trippy shit, I'll use auto-pan, or send a reverb zinging around the room, but most of the time I like to keep it simple.

pigmaker wrote:i like panning 2 takes of the same thign hard left and hard right respectively
but if u poop it down to mono it might sound like the world's cheapest flanger

you gots to be diligent with phasing.

Usually either hard left and hard right. Sometimes I go 9 & 3 o'clock. Both if I'm feeling crazy.

Depends on what it is, I run stereo or three-amp setups these days so usually fake how they'd be in the room.

Whatever else is dictated by the mix on the individual song.

I do love a dry signal hard left, delay and wacky hard left though.

One thing that turned out pretty cool for me was using my POD X3 and looking for a metal bass tone. Anyways, I've got my signal path all mapped out and lastly added a fuzz to one path and a tube screamer to the other and panned them with a modest separation.

Kinda sick of "big huge overdubbed hard panned rhythm" guitars so I've taken to panning one guitar track to one side and a lead synth to the other. If I had two guitar players on one song, hard panning with minimal overdubs.

Hard left and hard right for the initial rhythm guitar tracks, lightly less so for lead lines, solos are always dead middle along with bass, drums get panned according to each separate drum. Trippy when you hit toms and it swirls around.