ilovefuzz.com

Has anyone played both the EQD Arpanoid and the Montreal Assembly Nasa Attribute? I'm curious how they compare.

perhaps one important difference (at least at the moment) is that one is in production (EQD) and the other is not (MA)

hope this helps

FROM THE MAN HIMSELF!

multi_s wrote:perhaps one important difference (at least at the moment) is that one is in production (EQD) and the other is not (MA)

hope this helps

Glad to see you around these parts. Really anxious for your next stuff to come out.

I just got a Nasa Attribute and I'm LOVING it, but I had an opportunity to buy an Arpanoid off someone for thee cheepz and while I figure there's no point I was just wondering how different they are and would it be worth it to have both. Really though how many arpeggiators does one guy need.

But yeah, for general purposes I guess this thread is pretty useless.

my 2 centz:
I don't understand how the Arpanoid can be that useful without tap tempo or MIDI sync, in a multi-instrument situation I meant.
But that's just me.

Did I qualify that enough?

julius_deane wrote:my 2 centz:
I don't understand how the Arpanoid can be that useful without tap tempo or MIDI sync, in a multi-instrument situation I meant.
But that's just me.

Did I qualify that enough?

i have the same thought.

Does the arpanopid have a latch feature? I have a Nasa, and never tried a arp... but the latching tap and tappity tempo are super useful features. The Nasa is kinda lofi, but I actually kinda think that is a plus.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3jKdOcEas4[/youtube]
my demo if you have 15 minutes.
Good luck finding one. I wish I still had that p fax.