Page 1 of 3
Lolgibson
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 7:27 pm
by THEBEERHAMMER
Re: Lolgibson
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 7:49 pm
by Achtane
Samsit Tabriz 2 days ago
THIS GUITER IS SIMPLY AESOME!!!!!!
That said, no robotics? No built-in effects?
Not sure if Gibson...
Re: Lolgibson
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 8:21 pm
by gunslinger_burrito
"ultra-pointy styling"
Re: Lolgibson
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 8:22 pm
by foomanfat
So now they're making Jacksons?
Re: Lolgibson
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:13 pm
by DarkAxel
reminds me of Kramers
that being said... isn't Kramer owned by Gibson?
Re: Lolgibson
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:26 pm
by backwardsvoyager
Wow.
That's pretty damn ugly.
Re: Lolgibson
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:38 pm
by tuffteef
DNT CLICK THE LINK
Re: Lolgibson
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:21 pm
by Swordfishtrombone
I like this. Has the cheesy 80s hair metal look that I love for reasons that I don't understand, and the body shape is kind of interesting. If it wasn't for price, being set neck + disliking neck shape on most Epiphones and Gibsons I'd probably be in love with this.
Re: Lolgibson
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:24 pm
by THEBEERHAMMER
Swordfishtrombone wrote:I like this. Has the cheesy 80s hair metal look that I love for reasons that I don't understand, and the body shape is kind of interesting. If it wasn't for price, being set neck + disliking neck shape on most Epiphones and Gibsons I'd probably be in love with this.
Get the fuck out of here.
Re: Lolgibson
Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2013 10:31 pm
by Swordfishtrombone
THEBEERHAMMER wrote:Swordfishtrombone wrote:I like this. Has the cheesy 80s hair metal look that I love for reasons that I don't understand, and the body shape is kind of interesting. If it wasn't for price, being set neck + disliking neck shape on most Epiphones and Gibsons I'd probably be in love with this.
Get the fuck out of here.
You'll probably hate me since I also have a soft spot for reverse Vs. I <3 ugly guitars.
Re: Lolgibson
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 12:35 am
by Mudfuzz
foomanfat wrote:So now they're making Jacksons?
It's a reissue...
Re: Lolgibson
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 8:03 am
by foomanfat
Mudfuzz wrote:foomanfat wrote:So now they're making Jacksons?
It's a reissue...
So now they're reissuing their Jacksons?
Re: Lolgibson
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:57 am
by Mudfuzz
foomanfat wrote:Mudfuzz wrote:foomanfat wrote:So now they're making Jacksons?
It's a reissue...
So now they're reissuing their Jacksons?
It's about the bring'n back the 80's suckass type feel yo!
Re: Lolgibson
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 1:51 pm
by Psyre
Does "Timeless Looks" mean there was never a time those looked good?
Re: Lolgibson
Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 2:26 pm
by D.o.S.
