Page 1 of 2

So uh...so guys...

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 12:40 pm
by THEBEERHAMMER

Re: So uh...so guys...

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 12:57 pm
by Twangasaurus
Stupid Bilt making sexy shit I can't afford.

Re: So uh...so guys...

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 1:51 pm
by Achtane
Man.
Am I the only one here who doesn't like them?

Re: So uh...so guys...

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 1:54 pm
by terraformer
THEBEERHAMMER wrote:http://www.offsetguitars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=70886


Ahhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!! :!!!:

Re: So uh...so guys...

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 1:55 pm
by Twangasaurus
Achtane wrote:Man.
Am I the only one here who doesn't like them?


Starcasters or Bilt stuff? I know plenty of people that think both of them are gross. Even I think they look kind of dumb but I like dumb things.

Re: So uh...so guys...

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 1:56 pm
by Greenfuz
GAAHHHHHHHHHHHH


how much do these things cost??? lefty options???????

Re: So uh...so guys...

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 2:10 pm
by Achtane
Twangasaurus wrote:
Achtane wrote:Man.
Am I the only one here who doesn't like them?


Starcasters or Bilt stuff? I know plenty of people that think both of them are gross. Even I think they look kind of dumb but I like dumb things.


Starcasters.
I like some goofy looking guitars but Starcasters just look like butt to me.
And that dong/shoe headstock...

Re: So uh...so guys...

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:16 pm
by dubkitty
i prefer the Fender Starcaster look to the white Bilt, which seems to be trying to get into White Falcon territory and (like most attempts to bite the WF aesthetic) not getting there.

what i really would enjoy is a greenburst Starcaster. it'd be the epitome of "Ugly Beauty."

Re: So uh...so guys...

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 4:42 pm
by colin
As far as Bilt stuff goes I much prefer the Zaftig. In fact I'm likely going to be ordering one in a while. The Starcaster is cool too, just not quite for me.

Re: So uh...so guys...

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 7:35 pm
by Chankgeez
:idk: I think I may prefer the Fano version. :snax:

Re: So uh...so guys...

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 7:36 pm
by Holy Schnikes
The Fano is sexy, just looked it up.

Re: So uh...so guys...

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 9:57 pm
by cheesecats
Chankgeez wrote::idk: I think I may prefer the Fano version. :snax:


a rare one that's not pre-beat to hell

Image

Re: So uh...so guys...

Posted: Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:10 pm
by dubkitty
FilterTrons? noice!

Re: So uh...so guys...

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 7:04 pm
by Greenfuz
Image

wait so do all the headstocks on these bilts have that bevel?


that's fucking hot

Re: So uh...so guys...

Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 2:35 am
by masked elwood
Achtane wrote:Man.
Am I the only one here who doesn't like them?


nope.
i'd give up guitar before i'd play one of those. especially the fender version. very shit guitar...prolly doesn't even burn well. then again...i like the gibson marauder so what the fuck do i know? i do seem to prefer gibson's dark era better than fender's.