ilovefuzz.com

Are seriously awesome.

Yes? No?

Depends on the instrument.

+1 on firebird & thunderbird headstocks

Jero wrote:Depends on the instrument.

+1 on firebird & thunderbird headstocks

Agreed with these two instruments. Everything is gets a HELL NO from me. Especially Strats.

Jackson headstocks should be reversed. All of them. Forever.

Big yes.

Trifarce wrote:Jackson headstocks should be reversed. All of them. Forever.

Meh... I had one in reversed and I always felt silly with it. I like fenders reversed though, and birds.

Mudfuzz wrote:

Trifarce wrote:Jackson headstocks should be reversed. All of them. Forever.

Meh... I had one in reversed and I always felt silly with it. I like fenders reversed though, and birds.

If my band mates piss me off it's easier to "accidentally" jab them with it when it's reversed

My Jackson is a Kelly... [too bad for me.... it's only a guitar] it's pointy all over... Normally when bandmates piss me off I throw picks...

My jackson is a rhoads...therefore I just jave to swing it to decapitate eveything around.

I am pro reverse headstocks

I usually don't care for it, but I've seen a few instances in which it looks pretty cool.

sometimes. . . . only sometimes. . . .

a telecaster headstock reversed would look sooo shitty

It confuses me so much.
I have a few friends with guitars with reversed headstocks and I'm always like... what?

BUT THEY LOOK SO COOL D:

I only like the reversed Fender headstocks on Super Sonics.
I think of reverse firebirds as standard and think of the "non-reverse" as the flipped version. Though it does look pretty good, no matter which side it's on, the "reversed" firebird headstocks look less at odds with the axis of their necks, to me.