Re: The headsup sweet shit on ebay thread....
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2017 12:17 pm
Yeah, I don't see the problem. If you use Reverb as a sales platform, you should expect to pay the piper. 

OK, (1) why should anyone believe an anonymous report like this? (it's so Orwellian, I have a hard time giving it any credence)whoismarykelly wrote:Folks have posted that Reverb has charged them fees when a sale was arranged to be completed off the site but using the site to make the arrangements. Maybe not here but I've seen a couple accounts. Regardless it would be totally within reason for Reverb to oppose using their site for advertising to sell the item elsewhere. This is why eBay doesn't allow email addresses or phone numbers in listings and pops up a warning if you type an email or phone number into a message.
whoismarykelly wrote:The result would be that Reverb would simply ban a user if they had evidence terms were violated. They wouldn't bring a lawsuit. You're jumping to extremes that were not implied. I walked past reverb's offices recently and its a pretty substantial operation based on the amount of property they are leasing. It would be very simple to filter their message system for phone numbers and email addresses and look at communications associated with recently ended listings. Regardless, the max fee on a Reverb sale is $350, not a blanket percentage up to any amount. No one would be demanding $7,000. You can choose to believe or not believe anything.
https://www.thegearpage.net/board/index ... /22778572/
First, you said "Reverb could justifiably charge them" and now you're saying they'd "simply ban a user" who did this.whoismarykelly wrote:This is dangerous. If they sell via email and then end the listing saying they sold it elsewhere Reverb could justifiably charge them commission on the listing price.
Looking over his comments and reviewing Reverb's position, I think this is about legal protection for Reverb, more than it is about general pettiness of trying to claim a 3.5% sales fee. (that is assuming his claim is legitimate, he doesn't offer a screen capture or billing records) If people use Reverb as a means to commit fraud or to engineer other crimes (robbery, assault), then Reverb is in a position where it is ideal to enforce their policies without deviation, in order to guard against legal responsibility in any criminal practice.whoismarykelly wrote:You can choose to believe or not believe anything.
https://www.thegearpage.net/board/index ... /22778572/
now thats dangerous, [deleted for impressionable lurkers with no soul]I'd file a complaint with Visa and it'd be thrown out.
I thought Visa offered two-way protection, so they just ate it on something like that. I'm not familiar with the details of this particular transaction or where it took place, so I can't speculate beyond that.comesect2.0 wrote:now thats dangerous [...]I'd file a complaint with Visa and it'd be thrown out.
didnt last long
I had never heard of Falbo, so I wasn't sure if that was a typo (thinking Fano..). It turns out that you can't even find any active Falbo products on Reverb right now, even though I found a Web site.We wanted to let you know that the following brands will be lifting MAP restrictions from Friday to Monday: 65 Amps, Bogner, Diezel, Egnater, Falbo, Friedman, J. Rockett, Keeley (except: Caverns, Compressor+, D&M Drive, Neutrino, and all Minis), Morgan, Tone King, Walrus, Wampler.