HI,Seance wrote:untilshewokeme wrote:
yes sorry the pcbs have been delayed once again and now I have been told they will ship on Jan 19("or earlier"). We have everything else sitting ready to go now so they will move out asap once they arrive. I apologize for this but originally i outsourced the pcb assembly this time since it should have made everything quicker, but now it has taken about a month longer than i was quoted and probably I could have done them in house at the same speed with our own tools. There are some pics on my blog of the pile waiting for those into the pron.
Hi,phantasmagorovich wrote:Sorry, no offense meant. Maybe shrill isn't the exact word I was looking for. But when I had the Ct5 I felt it was too hi-fi to be pleasant to my ear, something the GB24 happily avoids, the being hi-fi.
When I had one, it must have been from the first or second batch you said you were thinking about a filtering option, Scott. Is this the filter you are talking about now, or was that one always in place?
Maybe I should also say that my rig is set to cut, so maybe it over-accentuates the higher registers that the Ct5 is able to reach.
yes sorry my response also probably sounded crabby, i just meant to say it is a bit subjective. the number of comments compared to say the number units sold on that in particular would be about half a percent so it's not something I had gone too far out of my way to care about, bigger fish to fry so to speak.
i don't remember if the filter mentioned above was implemented on the very first firmware off the top of my head. All ct5's are more hi fi than the gb24 was though, no matter which version/firm and operate in general in a wider bandwidth of the audible specturm. For the next firm/rev k release we can add tune-able lpf to feedback the gb24 patch (this is where the current filter is now but it is fixed at some frequency), likely accessed by holding down the soft switch in that mode, turning some knob etc. I doubt a dedicated knob for this will ever appear on this pedal though, it's not a feature i consider fundamental to the idea.
s