Re: Controversial Opinions
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 10:35 am

I blame the liquor.D.o.S. wrote:I'm trying to suggest that you did that thing where you get a song title 90% right but flub an essential detail.
Is that what you wrote your Film Studies thesis on?repoman wrote:Both MacCready and Childs were Things in the end.
If either of them were human, and they knew they would freeze to death, they would not take the chance that the other was possibly the Thing, so on seeing each other both would have tried to kill each other. But since they did not, both were Things.
repoman wrote:Both MacCready and Childs were Things in the end.
If either of them were human, and they knew they would freeze to death, they would not take the chance that the other was possibly the Thing, so on seeing each other both would have tried to kill each other. But since they did not, both were Things.
Whut. This is hilarious while also being mind boggling if you actually think that.friendship wrote:amphibians are bugs
More like 10, no?01010111 wrote:There are only two food groups: salty and sweet
There are only 10 groups of people tootremolo3 wrote:More like 10, no?01010111 wrote:There are only two food groups: salty and sweet
Truth.repoman wrote:Both MacCready and Childs were Things in the end.
If either of them were human, and they knew they would freeze to death, they would not take the chance that the other was possibly the Thing, so on seeing each other both would have tried to kill each other. But since they did not, both were Things.
I got A B+Chankgeez wrote:Is that what you wrote your Film Studies thesis on?repoman wrote:Both MacCready and Childs were Things in the end.
If either of them were human, and they knew they would freeze to death, they would not take the chance that the other was possibly the Thing, so on seeing each other both would have tried to kill each other. But since they did not, both were Things.