from the manual:Dark Barn wrote:yeah Pam's will be good for LFOs but personally I wouldn't want to rely on it for envelopes, which are more fun if they can be triggered instead of set to a fixed clock or Euclidean sequence, you have Maths but it might not be enough, especially if you are using maths for other functions. *Or* Can the inputs on New Pam's be used to trigger envelopes? I haven't looked into all the new features.
"Each output is now able to provide not just clocked triggers but also rhythmic
waveforms with many parameters controllable directly and via assigning to external
CV control. Pamela has grown beyond a clever clock and now provides almost
limitless synced modulation possibilities.
Pamela’s NEW Workout provides a wide range of features in a compact space.
They include;
• BPM based clock with tempo rates 10-300BPM.
• 8 Clocked voltage outputs each with independent adjustable;
• Clock divisors and multipliers from /512 to x48 including various non
integer factors.
• Gated, Triangle, Sine, Envelope & random base waveforms.
• Waveform level and pulse width / skewing.
• Phase, Delay and delay division (for complex swing)
• Euclidean and random step skipping with beat based looping for rhythm
creation
• All output parameters assignable to x2 CV inputs with individual software
offset, attenuation and monitoring.
• Per output and group saving and loading to 200 banks.
• Voltage and direct control of clock stop/start, reset and rate..
• Sync to an external clock input at 48 to 1 PPQN.
• Realtime intuitive user interface with high resolution LED display.
• Provides dedicated DIN Sync and MIDI clock output via optional expander(s). "
