ilovefuzz.com

I can't pick between these two.

For all their faults (and there are many), the Rolling Stones at their peak are/were really fucking good.


More at 11.

Gross!

They have so many masterpieces that the only abomination is your inability to recognize the greatness.


There is a lot (like a lot) of hot garbage, but I think you could pretty comfortably take their 20 best songs and put it up against more or less anything.

he's right, you know.

Beggar's Banquet is a pretty tight album.

They're pretty unfuckwithable up through Tattoo You, aside from a couple of stinkers. Not many, though.

After that, lotta shit. But for fuck's sake, totally forgivable, haha...

dubkitty wrote:he's right, you know.

Yes

Watts is probably the living definition of a solid classic rock drummer.

I am blowing off people I don't want to talk to both at work and in real life.

I'm a big Exile fan.

Back in the Sixties, they were a brilliant product of their times. The social turbulence of the Sixties was a catalyst for radical cultural change, and the music was a focal point for those changes. The Stones had the kind of impact on musical consciousness that will never be seen again.

Invisible Man wrote:I am blowing off people I don't want to talk to both at work and in real life.

That's quite a thing to admit.

snipelfritz wrote:Watts is probably the living definition of a solid classic rock drummer.

So what you're saying is that he's incredibly boring? It's a perfect fit!

jrfox92 wrote:

Invisible Man wrote:I am blowing off people I don't want to talk to both at work and in real life.

That's quite a thing to admit.

I'm good at doing this. It really blows to have to humor people you don't want to talk to, and it also usually doesn't have the best results when you flat out tell someone you don't want to listen to their shit. I've done all three, and your current M.O. is probably the best