ilovefuzz.com

D.o.S. wrote:you're all so fucking wrong I can't even.

Story of your life.

So is there any good info on what this might cost?

Instead of giving us pricing information, they decided to give us mockups of new versions of the same synth?

They probably haven't settled on pricing just yet, setting web crawling bots to collect feedback from the conversations of their target demographic to see how hard they can squeeze.

Therefore: as a male music industry professional in his early 40s I would gladly pay $20 (twenty dollars U.S.) for that glossy contraption.

01000010 01010101 01011001 00100000 01001101 01011001 00100000 01000011 01000101 01010010 01000101 01000001 01001100

crochambeau wrote:01000010 01010101 01011001 00100000 01001101 01011001 00100000 01000011 01000101 01010010 01000101 01000001 01001100

let me get out my decoder ring... and.... AH!

Time to buy my Crochamb-O's

crochambeau wrote:They probably haven't settled on pricing just yet, setting web crawling bots to collect feedback from the conversations of their target demographic to see how hard they can squeeze.

Therefore: as a male music industry professional in his early 40s I would gladly pay $20 (twenty dollars U.S.) for that glossy contraption.

01000010 01010101 01011001 00100000 01001101 01011001 00100000 01000011 01000101 01010010 01000101 01000001 01001100

It depends on how they're algorithm weights the individual responses, though. Just in case they're using a word-count algorithm....

I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this. I wouldn't pay more than $20 for this.

Then they're not likely to make it, at $20 there's no way it covers even the box and shipping.

As long as it's reasonable I'll be on board.

rfurtkamp wrote:Then they're not likely to make it, at $20 there's no way it covers even the box and shipping.

Not trying to own the curve, just balance it toward the reasonable...

DRodriguez wrote:Time to buy my Crochamb-O's

D.o.S. wrote:

Strange Tales wrote:Whoever changed the name from "Phat 12" deserves a massive kick in the reproductive bits

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rrZ-sA4FQc[/youtube]

Realistically. Think this will be $500 or under?

$499-$599 is my guess.

There is no way in hell a 12 voice Polysynth with all these features is going to be less than 4 digits. Like, $1999 would probably be a crazy price for how much is in this.

Strange Tales wrote:crazy price

But Behringer?

$1999 would be crazy, considering the closest thing on the market to it is the Dave Smith Instruments Prophet 12, which clocks in at $2999ish.

That said, i want Behringer to pull the Behringer thing on us and drop it at like $1000-1300. They probably won't, but it might be important to remember that the original Juno 6 cost about 1/3 of what the Prophet 5 and other top of the line poly synths cost. I know this is way more featured than the Junos, but those have been the constant reference point from Behringer as a company and Uli himself, so it seems worth keeping in mind.