"post-rock" that doesn't sound like traditional "post-rock"

Your band, other bands, singers, songwriters, more.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
dase
HERO
HERO
Posts: 904
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:57 am

Re: "post-rock" that doesn't sound like traditional "post-ro

Post by dase »

retinal orbita wrote:
gunslinger_burrito wrote:dude, I'm fucking stoked for this new record. I love that new track.
Really good. I still haven't tracked down Flipper but Dagdrom was stellar. I like Nadja best when they're collaborating with other people most of the time but I can do with a new full on record. I like that he's slowed down their output over the past year or two so I can absorb each one more....

this, seriously. Everything they do is great (and they're also awesome live and really nice people which makes me wanna support them) but I just can't keep up!
User avatar
D.o.S.
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:47 am
Location: Ewe-Kay

Re: "post-rock" that doesn't sound like traditional "post-ro

Post by D.o.S. »

dase wrote: hahaha. Yeah but at least some of those bands were about CO-OPTING styles outside of a western pop music cultural millieu. That still counts! ;)
Solid point, but I think you could say that for most second or third wave/normalized genre staples.
good deals are here.
flesh couch is here.
UglyCasanova wrote: It's not the expensive programs you use, it's the way you click and drag.
Achtane wrote:
comesect2.0 wrote:Michael Jackson king tut little Richard in your butt.
IT'S THE ENNNND OF THE WORRRLD AS WE KNOW IT
Post Reply