ilovefuzz.com

ohsojayadeva wrote:Devi responds to a simple and exceptionally relevant question by telling me to fuck off... but I'm the troll.

answer was given here: viewtopic.php?f=150&t=19445&start=30#p301395
your so called ilf experience should have brought the same thought up.

fiddelerselbow wrote:

bubstance wrote:WAIT A MINUTE EVERYBODY HOLD THE FUCKING PHONE.

People though that Billy Corgan was something other than a giant fetus at some point?

?

THAT'S JUST MORE PROOF, SON.

devi ever wrote:Drop it dude. Seriously.

I am sincerely sorry if talking about the subject that you brought up has made you uncomfortable.

ohsojayadeva wrote:

devi ever wrote:Drop it dude. Seriously.

I am sincerely sorry if talking about the subject that you brought up has made you uncomfortable.

I believe you posted this once, good sir.

Thanks for squaring me Bub. You are absolutely right.

Of course I am.

You're a hypocrite.

i Billy Corgan... now that's trollin', shun!

Actions have consequences.

Apparently not. Tweet pulled.

I can see it still.

http://twitter.com/#!/billy

this is a reminder that no one should ever get involved with billy corgan.
it never turns out well.

masked elwood wrote:this is a reminder that no one should ever get involved with devi.
it never turns out well.

seriously. Devi had idolized this Billy, now that he doesn't like her product, all of a sudden he is a tired hack. Wow. yeah, Billy was a dick about the pedal and, well, just generally a dick, but everyone knew that he was a dick. The problem is devi and billy are too much alike...egos and drama queens. Devi's retorts are just as infantile as Billy's comments, and everyone knows that Devi is just as much of a drama queen as Billy. I can see being defensive about the gender comments as they are irrelevant, but something must've spurned Billy's response on twitter. I can't imagine Ken making a bad pedal, but perhaps Billy thought it disingenuous of Devi to take as much ownership of this "idea" as Devi did, maybe he just didn't like the sound, maybe Devi antagonized him with what has always come across as hero-worship stalking behavior. Who knows, but Devi has a lot more to reveal about the situation besides saying "fuck off" for anyone else besides Billy and Devi to attempt taking sides. Now, just waiting for devi and her throng of followers to tell me to "fuck off."

harpies wrote:

masked elwood wrote:this is a reminder that no one should ever get involved with devi.
it never turns out well.

seriously. Devi had idolized this Billy, now that he doesn't like her product, all of a sudden he is a tired hack. Wow. yeah, Billy was a dick about the pedal and, well, just generally a dick, but everyone knew that he was a dick. The problem is devi and billy are too much alike...egos and drama queens. Devi's retorts are just as infantile as Billy's comments, and everyone knows that Devi is just as much of a drama queen as Billy. I can see being defensive about the gender comments as they are irrelevant, but something must've spurned Billy's response on twitter. I can't imagine Ken making a bad pedal, but perhaps Billy thought it disingenuous of Devi to take as much ownership of this "idea" as Devi did, maybe he just didn't like the sound, maybe Devi antagonized him with what has always come across as hero-worship stalking behavior. Who knows, but Devi has a lot more to reveal about the situation besides saying "fuck off" for anyone else besides Billy and Devi to attempt taking sides. Now, just waiting for devi and her throng of followers to tell me to "fuck off."

FUCK OFF! lolz jk bro. I am casting no stones or judgement until more has been revealed

ohsojayadeva wrote:

devi ever wrote:Drop it dude. Seriously.

I am sincerely sorry if talking about the subject that you brought up has made you uncomfortable.

one thing is clear already though. ^this is some troll shit for sure

Courtney Love did it.

On reflection, I am genuinely sorry for being antagonistic.

Do I think Billy's comments on twitter were completely out of line? Yes, absolutely. Does that mean we know everything about what prompted this situation? No, we don't. I wanted to be clear that we don't have all the facts, and I think it would be a mistake for any of us to pick up our pitchforks based solely on hearing one side of what is clearly an emotionally charged and volatile situation.

Out of respect I will bow out of this thread. Shalom!