ilovefuzz.com

bobloblah wrote:parker.... ewwwww
a fucking crazy guitar to play. feels awesome, but the looks like shit.

looks way better in real life than in the pictures

and it's crazy, but they're comfortable and really easy to play... and have great tones!

yeah... i remmber now... i'd feel like a jackass playing Parker Belew signature guitar... just because of the line6 modeling inside

bobloblah wrote:parker.... ewwwww
a fucking crazy guitar to play. feels awesome, but the looks like shit.

never played one, but they're uglier than jocelyn wildenstein with plastic surgery....actually no they're not.

culturejam wrote:

masked elwood wrote:

dubkitty wrote:
really expensive instruments...i'd feel like a total dick rocking a $6000 guitar. "look at me, i has moneez!"

i gig with my vintage guitars and feel if you don't use your vintage guitar you're a poser.
why have a nice guitar and not use it?

Maybe the OP meant guitars that *start off* costing $6000. Guitars that are vintage today were usually once fairly reasonably priced.

But if I had a brand new $6000 guitar, I'd play the shit out of it.

I really dont care how much your guitar costs (unless its a gustavsson, theres no way a plainass solidbody guitar is worth as much as that asshole charges) i just HATE HATE HATE guitars that look like this and couldnt play them no matter what they sounded or played like





Also these ark amps look fucking stupid

THAT, is why I couldn't play a PRS.

smile_man wrote:

THAT, is why I couldn't play a PRS.

Or anything Mesa.

general consensus that nickleback sucks? yet another reason i love this place...

epiphone zakk wylde "disciple". wtf was he thinking? he should have stayed with the bullseye les pauls....

ms1012 wrote:epiphone zakk wylde "disciple". wtf was he thinking? he should have stayed with the bullseye les pauls....

I mean, are you shitting me? Also, didn't the guy from Ministry play something like that?

it's so fucking ugly. at least that guy from ministry's guitar makes use of the entire body. behind that floyd rose is easily a foot of nothing. i have a hard time believing the folks at gibson/epiphone made that into a production model thinking it would sell.

maz91379 wrote:

ms1012 wrote:it's so fucking ugly. at least that guy from ministry's guitar makes use of the entire body. behind that floyd rose is easily a foot of nothing. i have a hard time believing the folks at gibson/epiphone made that into a production model thinking it would sell.

Half the shit gibson makes shouldn't sell and is tacky as shit .

Can't wait until I see hardcore bands using that guitar.

theavondon wrote:

maz91379 wrote:

ms1012 wrote:it's so fucking ugly. at least that guy from ministry's guitar makes use of the entire body. behind that floyd rose is easily a foot of nothing. i have a hard time believing the folks at gibson/epiphone made that into a production model thinking it would sell.

Half the shit gibson makes shouldn't sell and is tacky as shit .

Can't wait until I see hardcore bands using that guitar.

unfortunately, that day may come

and i can't stand gibson's new stuff. that firebird x is hideous and i literally don't find anything about it's features to be appealing.

ms1012 wrote:

theavondon wrote:
Can't wait until I see hardcore bands using that guitar.

unfortunately, that day may come

They should just sell it with three strings.

shredder guitars, gretsch guitars (i love them, but i always feel like an ass playing them because its like "oh, you have a gretsch but you don't play rockabilly?), anything with a bright sunburst, or a highly figured top with a transparent color finish, carvins, and boss and line 6 pedals.

aww, come on. ArK amps are gorgeous! they're like art modern! tiki sculptures. but amp form.

also any Warwick bass that isn't a thumb or a dolphin.