Let's see your BASS VI, people

Guitar and bass lounge at the Wang Bar.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

Post Reply
User avatar
Strange Tales
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4499
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 7:14 pm
Location: America's Sorrow: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Let's see your BASS VI, people

Post by Strange Tales »

Alright, so I'm building a Bass VI. Really only have two things on my mind now.

Warmoth forces a 10" radius neck. The Staytrem bridges are built for 9.5". Staytrem still hasn't gotten back to me so I ask you, will this difference fuck anything up?

How heavy strings should I get? I'm doing probably drop d and maybe c if I'm feeling it, so I'm guessing in the .100 range?
木枯らし // 木漏れ日 // 風に綱は戦ぐ

Strange Tales Distro - Japanese Underground Music Distribution in the US
Invisible Man wrote:Strange Tales: putting the ‘weeb’ in ‘dweeb’ since whenever.
User avatar
neonblack
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 8090
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:00 am
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re: Let's see your BASS VI, people

Post by neonblack »

.102 was perfect tension for E standard for me. Not floppy, plenty of tension and zing.

Maybe go .106 if you're tuning down.
User avatar
Bon Hoga
committed
committed
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Let's see your BASS VI, people

Post by Bon Hoga »

Strange Tales wrote:Alright, so I'm building a Bass VI. Really only have two things on my mind now.

Warmoth forces a 10" radius neck. The Staytrem bridges are built for 9.5". Staytrem still hasn't gotten back to me so I ask you, will this difference fuck anything up?

How heavy strings should I get? I'm doing probably drop d and maybe c if I'm feeling it, so I'm guessing in the .100 range?


1) 0.5" won't make any difference.

2) Kalium .106 is floppy tuned to D, about as floppy as a LaBella .95. I suppose a LaBella .105 would be perfect.
User avatar
Strange Tales
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4499
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 7:14 pm
Location: America's Sorrow: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Let's see your BASS VI, people

Post by Strange Tales »

Bon Hoga wrote:
Strange Tales wrote:Alright, so I'm building a Bass VI. Really only have two things on my mind now.

Warmoth forces a 10" radius neck. The Staytrem bridges are built for 9.5". Staytrem still hasn't gotten back to me so I ask you, will this difference fuck anything up?

How heavy strings should I get? I'm doing probably drop d and maybe c if I'm feeling it, so I'm guessing in the .100 range?


1) 0.5" won't make any difference.

2) Kalium .106 is floppy tuned to D, about as floppy as a LaBella .95. I suppose a LaBella .105 would be perfect.


Roger on the second point. I'll go for those then.

A dude I play with often told me that .5" will make it so the action on my 3rd and 4th strings will be subtly different and just a tiny bit off. I'm not sure how off it will be though and if I'm just worrying over nothing.
木枯らし // 木漏れ日 // 風に綱は戦ぐ

Strange Tales Distro - Japanese Underground Music Distribution in the US
Invisible Man wrote:Strange Tales: putting the ‘weeb’ in ‘dweeb’ since whenever.
User avatar
Bon Hoga
committed
committed
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Let's see your BASS VI, people

Post by Bon Hoga »

A friend of mine has a 12" bridge on a 9.5" Jazzmaster, and it's one of the most comfortable and playable guitars I've ever picked up in my life. You'll be fine with a 9.5" bridge. As for the strings, if you're ordering a custom set consider going with lighter top strings. My set is .20, .30, .45, .60, .80, .105. I'm pretty happy with how they feel and sound, except the .105 is a bit too floppy for my taste. I'll be going with LaBellas next time, though Kaliums are very good indeed, just not for drop D I suppose.
User avatar
Strange Tales
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4499
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 7:14 pm
Location: America's Sorrow: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: Let's see your BASS VI, people

Post by Strange Tales »

That's definitely very comforting to know.

I was planning to go for lighter strings on the higher up as well. Was thinking of something in that range. Thanks!
木枯らし // 木漏れ日 // 風に綱は戦ぐ

Strange Tales Distro - Japanese Underground Music Distribution in the US
Invisible Man wrote:Strange Tales: putting the ‘weeb’ in ‘dweeb’ since whenever.
User avatar
BoatRich
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2374
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 2:58 pm
Location: Northern VA/DC

Re: Let's see your BASS VI, people

Post by BoatRich »

I use a kalium .110 low string with an.106 set for the rest. It's pretty solid in drop C#
User avatar
Bon Hoga
committed
committed
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Let's see your BASS VI, people

Post by Bon Hoga »

BoatRich wrote:I use a kalium .110 low string with an.106 set for the rest. It's pretty solid in drop C#


I was thinking of upping the low D to .110, but a .30 difference between two adjacent strings is a bit too much, and I don't want to up the fifth string because.80 is perfect for A. Why couldn't I just play harmonica or Jew's harp :picard:
User avatar
BoatRich
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2374
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 2:58 pm
Location: Northern VA/DC

Re: Let's see your BASS VI, people

Post by BoatRich »

Bon Hoga wrote:
BoatRich wrote:I use a kalium .110 low string with an.106 set for the rest. It's pretty solid in drop C#


I was thinking of upping the low D to .110, but a .30 difference between two adjacent strings is a bit too much, and I don't want to up the fifth string because.80 is perfect for A. Why couldn't I just play harmonica or Jew's harp :picard:

I think it'll be a little easier on yours because of the hardtail? For whatever reason I feel like the offset bridge makes stability a little harder with light gauge strings. A .106 is fine when the strings are new/the guitar is in Eb standard but I like a lot of tension on my low strings.
User avatar
Bon Hoga
committed
committed
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Let's see your BASS VI, people

Post by Bon Hoga »

Don't think so, all that enters into it is the speaking length of the string, the bit from the saddle to the nut; the type of the bridge shouldn't make any difference.
User avatar
BoatRich
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2374
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 2:58 pm
Location: Northern VA/DC

Re: Let's see your BASS VI, people

Post by BoatRich »

Makes sense. I haven't tried flats because I don't like the tone/feel but I can imagine that's your best bet.
User avatar
BoatRich
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2374
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2014 2:58 pm
Location: Northern VA/DC

Re: Let's see your BASS VI, people

Post by BoatRich »

Has anyone tried the Eastwood Sidejack VI? I'm considering saving for a cream one or building my next one. The body shape is great and I like P90's
User avatar
Bon Hoga
committed
committed
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Let's see your BASS VI, people

Post by Bon Hoga »

Ok people, I've been unwittingly spreading misinformation in this thread. The Kalium .105 is perfectly fine for drop D, not floppy at all. I realised today at band practice that I was tuned to drop C the entire time (no idea how that happened), and for that tuning it is indeed floppy. When I tuned up to drop D it was fine. Sorry.
User avatar
WeHuntKings
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2356
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:46 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: Let's see your BASS VI, people

Post by WeHuntKings »

So I'm recording a black metal album this December with the bass VI being the focal point of the instrumentation. Lots of harsh distortion/fuzz and tremolo picking. I've found that it sounds really great through a twin reverb! Do you think splitting it out into a bass amp for extra girth would be cool, or would it just be a muddy mess?
User avatar
wafl
experienced
experienced
Posts: 655
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 9:58 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Let's see your BASS VI, people

Post by wafl »

Nah that would probably be best. I find that the twin has trouble with the low E.
Post Reply