ilovefuzz.com

I wonder if there was a hidden meaning to Trumps Confeve tweet or if he is just insane. It's hard to know.

The scary part to me is that either one could be true.


I find it obnoxious that politicians use social media now. I just don't get it. It's fucking stupid. I hate Twitter, so I'll never see that shit until it's on the news, which is even more annoying.

Fucking joke man...

"covfefe" = coverage

Trump's just another loser who thinks he's won.

jwar wrote: I find it obnoxious that politicians use social media now.

Yeah, but Trump was a twitter whore long before he became a "polytishun".

I wouldn't have even known that before this election though. Fucking media is all over Twitter. Seems stupid, but at the same time I get it. Can't have the leader of the nation talking insane without being called out.

It occurs to me that Twitter is a cancer though and probably needs to die. Seriously, I've never understood Twitter.

repoman wrote:

To believe that humans are having a catastrophic effect on the course of the climate, you have to believe that 100 years of data is somehow worthy of scientific significance in a climate system that is 4.5 billion years old, of which the data was collected with disparate tools and methodologies, none of which are standardized to each other, which are plugged into subjective mathematical equations, of which the use of has provided climate scientists with thousands of models, that have an astounding 100% failure rate.

The guy who started AGW- Dr. Roger Revelle, made it his mission in the last 10 years of his life to notify the public his work had been hijacked by politicians and agendas.

We are at a point in the climates history where CO2 levels have almost never been lower than it is today. Plants are pretty much in a CO2 famine right now. Historical average is more like 2500ppm. There is no place for CO2 levels to go but up. We do not have any sort of data to suggest that the rise in CO2 levels right now is special due to human CO2 production. There is no scientific evidence that can say that the rise is in fact unique, to have done that, we would need standardized testing apparatus at millions of points across the globe for millions of years.

There's no doubt that scientific facts get politicized. You can make any argument you want interpreting numbers to your advantage.

Ever work in a kitchen? Gets hot, right?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWphqA1Slrw[/youtube]

@repoman: to sidestep all your arguments in favor of this red herring, do you ever think you're wrong about anything?

repoman wrote:a bunch of stuff which the same "reasoning" could be used to argue against what I said

fixed.

Yes. Way too much.

Blackened Soul wrote:

repoman wrote:a bunch of stuff which the same "reasoning" could be used to argue against what I said

fixed.

How so?