ilovefuzz.com

accurate. there's really not too much going wrong in my life though, just crazy shit happens that freaks me out really.

*dabs*

this guy...

You all are wonderful, though I do mean that.

and glow in the dark nail polish is edgy as fuck

I imagine D.O.S. types each post with the flair of someone writing with a giant feather quill.

Fuck you drink bleach you're a moronic twat love you bb

D.o.S./10; cosigned, &c.

Some nice, bitingly witty personal attacks up in here.

I also think I've really figured out what D.o.S. stands for this time:

Discourses of (a) ShamelessLeftist

snipelfritz wrote:I imagine D.O.S. types each post with the flair of someone writing with a giant feather quill.

There must and shall be aspirin.

D.o.S. wrote:

Faldoe wrote:
Whenever I pose a critical response to you there is never a counter-argument from you but some kind of clever/comedic dismissal or some obscurantist statement. I'd love dialog.

The latter part of the above quoted post of yours is a perfect example.

I'm not sure thats not true in the aggregate, though. I've "legitimately" answered several posters in this thread. As far as I can see you just want a token "opponent" and while I'm willing to do that for all sorts of ILFers I do t particularly care to extend that to you, not out of malice but because you rarely articulate anything beyond "LOL SJWs"

So, sorry? I just don't want you to feel that I'm not available to argue because I can't string together anything worth arguing -- it's because it's not worth my time to argue with someone who responds to a link I share with "xD did you read this before sharing it's totally calling 'your people' out."

Again, DOS. Here is a good example. I wrote a response to what you said to rustywire about race and class and you didn't say anything about it.

I don't want a token opponent or poster to bash solely for their views. I would like them to answer to those views with actual arguments and not evade being challenged on them.

I have made simplistic and snarky remarks about SJWs but not all my posts have been just that: a "lol SJWs." I don't dismiss - or think it illegitimate - the causes or aspects with which many SJWs are involved in but I disagree with many of their reactionary viewpoints and analysis.

I asked if you read that link cause it makes some good points and I'm assuming - maybe that was too much on my part - since you said "here is a fun one," that you didn't find anything of value in it and I find that interesting since it makes some good points about Post-Modernism and the kind of nihilism that has been brewing in the SJW left.

Yeah sorry Fals I was a little bit loaded when I read the first (one line, pre-edit) post and I was a lot a bit loaded when I responded again. (obviously). Therefore "Will read later," and I will read it later today.

But the article is a good article, yes.

From that article:
"Thus, the Venus de Milo has no more aesthetic value than a crucifix in a jar full of urine; Beethoven’s symphonies are no more profound than the latest round of top 40 hits; all religions are fundamentally the same, and their “moderate” postmodern adherents are all comfortably represented on the “Coexist” bumper sticker."

Well duh. Piss Christ is way better than the Venus de Milo. Migos' "bad and boujee" wipes the floor with beethoven. And yes it's real cute to poke fun at the co-exist sticker but at least those are well intentioned. The "SJW left" is not nihilisitc, its just the flip side of conservative politics. I get it, people are shitty and obnoxious. Hypocrisy and fake indignation aren't exclusive to one side though, and screaming for justice isn't nihilism. I feel like everybody just tries to out Bill O'Reilly each other. "YOU ARE WRONG AND DISGUSTING SO I WILL NOW SPEAK OVER YOU. EVERYBODY BUY MY BOOK ABOUT HOW WRONG THIS PERSON IS."