ilovefuzz.com

it's a california thing. don't hold it against us. everything is just so fucking exaggerated here we just can't help to break things down and mock them to make ourselves feel in control.

So here's a hypothetical east coast rejoinder:


Go drink a gallon of bleach for me. Don't worry. I'll be sure to let the media know you weren't concerned about the suffix they add to your obituary.



(Obviously I don't want any ILFer to actually do that. Don't do that. Please. It's the cold. It makes us lash out.(

D.o.S. wrote:So here's a hypothetical east coast rejoinder:


Go drink a gallon of bleach for me. Don't worry. I'll be sure to let the media know you weren't concerned about the suffix they add to your obituary.



(Obviously I don't want any ILFer to actually do that. Don't do that. Please.)

my sentiments exactly

waltdogg wrote:it's a california thing.

So is that we can hold our own against the English and French in sarcasm… well the non dumb ones… hard t tell sometimes though on line.. sarcasm.. or being dumb..

I mean but in all actuality when 90% of your posts in political threads contain "the left" you're either dubkitty circa 2012 or someone equally lacking in nuance.

this page is gold.

D.o.S. wrote:I mean but in all actuality when 90% of your posts in political threads contain "the left" you're either dubkitty circa 2012 or someone equally lacking in nuance.

true but I tend to skip bluthering posts that are a lot of words without a thesis of some kind at the top of the WOT so I've ignored 80% of what is bugging you

Mudfuzz wrote:

waltdogg wrote:it's a california thing.

So is that we can hold our own against the English and French in sarcasm… well the non dumb ones… hard t tell sometimes though on line.. sarcasm.. or being dumb..

Isn't that why we established sarcasm font color back on page 129?

Mudfuzz wrote:

D.o.S. wrote:I mean but in all actuality when 90% of your posts in political threads contain "the left" you're either dubkitty circa 2012 or someone equally lacking in nuance.

true but I tend to skip bluthering posts that are a lot of words without a thesis of some kind at the top of the WOT so I've ignored 80% of what is bugging you

this is where i'm coming from. i'm just throwing in random comments for no reason because that's what i do.

still, this page has been very entertaining.

waltdogg wrote:

Mudfuzz wrote:

D.o.S. wrote:I mean but in all actuality when 90% of your posts in political threads contain "the left" you're either dubkitty circa 2012 or someone equally lacking in nuance.

true but I tend to skip bluthering posts that are a lot of words without a thesis of some kind at the top of the WOT so I've ignored 80% of what is bugging you

this is where i'm coming from. i'm just throwing in random comments for no reason because that's what i do.

still, this page has been very entertaining.

jrfox92 wrote:

Mudfuzz wrote:

waltdogg wrote:it's a california thing.

So is that we can hold our own against the English and French in sarcasm… well the non dumb ones… hard t tell sometimes though on line.. sarcasm.. or being dumb..

Isn't that why we established sarcasm font color back on page 129?

what if you are color blind? sheep and cows can't see color and they are the ones that can't see sarcasm when it hits them like a nice shiny nailbat

All, I am a solid bit loaded and may have been unnecessarily rude/sweeping/overreaching in my statements. I don't actually mean to offend anyone here and I'm sorry if I did.

this fun though

very

i'm almost always higher than a kite and being nonsensical when i'm browsing on ilf, and when i'm not, i'm dead sober and probably looking for a fight.

That said I'm sure JRfox has the IQ if a particularly dull amoeba, mud fuzz still thinks painting his nails is edgy, and waltdogg would solve 98.9% of the problems in his life if he stopped dabbing for at least 8 consecutive waking hours.