Re: State of the Flanger: 2020
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2019 5:33 am
Oh! Inverting the delay line is what I'm into. Negative feedback is awesome too but it's not as much of a deal maker when a pedal has it.
Sounds like it's modeled on the A/DA. So, that makes sense.gila_crisis wrote:80A Flanger
Dandolin wrote:my favorite Panasonic bbd comparison table:
this is really cool I didnt even know it could get any tighter than the HF-2 (which is 512 I think), FL99 has dual 512. Now where can I get a flanger with a 64 stage BBD ?Dandolin wrote:lined up a bunch of flangers with Chankgeez yesterday
Subdecay Blue Shift short time flanger with the MN3209 (256 stage bbd) is mighty sweet - the sweep sits nice and high, up outta ya dry signal's fundamentals, plus the ratio of apparent comb-filtering to pitch shift is very nice with the manual past 1 o'clock. Overall, a very sweet-toned, if "light" flanger effect, and t'would be my choice to gigboard, should I get back to giggery.
An 8Ts Aria with the same chip was very similar, with just a touch more range on the feedback/resonance control (but sadly no lfo wondergussy and a wonky soft-touch switch). Neither one of them was getting close to self-oscillation, though. Pre-flanger gain stacking helped a little bit, but it was close-but-no-cigar in the end....
I wondered whether that oscillation shyness had anything to do with the relatively short delay time range on the MN3009 housed in those flangi, but on reflection, I doubt it. Check out this demo of the Guyatone PS-004, which runs an MN3006 with only 128 stages (half the delay time). Not only does it oscillate like a cheezy UFO in a b-movie, but it seems to lean into it...hard.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Jd9tIeIDtg[/youtube]
still, might have something to do with it...depending on how the chip is clocked. It's well known that you can clock an MN3007/3207 into the stratospherically short delay times, if ya can crack the capacitance conundrum and really drive that clock chip. Likewise, I suppose pushing the outer limits on the max delay of a shorter brigade chip might result in some noisier, chorusier, but...wilder[?] swangs....![]()
Anyway, seems like a good time to break out the feedback looper![]()
The cheapie Arion I picked up recently was the day's surprise - very cool throaty tone, kinda reminiscent of negative feedback - sounds great, and quite distinct from the mass of BF2 derivatives out there (not that there's anything wrong with those)...not too shabby for $33.
my Vox 1902's switch failed mechanically before I even got to show it off to Chank
to my utter humiliation, I failed the Starlight DLX testHaven't used it in a while, and it was taking way too long to set up a decent sound - gotta go back and do my homework on that one
![]()
And last but not least, there was the wondrous Fender/NeXt flanger, which was, as expected, awesome in it's sweep range, ability to oscillate, and kinda freaky ability to swallow all your bass and spit it out boosterazazzed. Not necessarily a thing for the ones out there that want their flangerazazzed tone to resemble their non- flangerazazzed tone as closely as possible (you guys might want to go on a field trip to That Pedal Show HQ and have Dan give you a subliminal flanger demo on his Thorpy while Chank and I rattle the windows with the NeXt).
Also, thanks to Chank, I may soon be able to open up a busted NeXt to solve the mystery of what chip is shacked up in there with tiny transistorized Meghan Trainor!![]()
The only real downer besides the double switch imbroglio was my inexplicable failure, despite Chank's specific and timely reminder, to turn them all on at once.
![]()
![]()
t'would've been aws, I am sure, especially given the wonder that ensued upon the turning-on of five magnificent lofi warblesources at once, but that is a tale for another threaddid I mention homies that we're living in a golden age of lofi warblers?