Page 4 of 10

Re: Man the doom movement was really disappointing.

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 9:33 pm
by Lurker13
aen wrote:I think any sub-genre that gets so specific ends up as a cannibalistic self parody. I honestly think that a lot of these doom bands are like "YES! That sounds just like Electric Wizard/Sleep/whatever!" Rather than "Oh man, that's a sweet riff, but it's pretty much Electric Wizard."
I agree, whenever you have to color within the lines you lose the freedom to express yourself, and everything becomes derivative.

But I am a major Sabbath fanatic, and I like a few of the better doom bands, like Electric Wizard, YOB, and Madder Mortem. They were actually creative.

Re: Man the doom movement was really disappointing.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:54 am
by aen
Blackened Soul wrote:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxchcNLWpH4[/youtube]

We had a henchman who would listen to this kind of video game music, it was very unpleasant.

Re: Man the doom movement was really disappointing.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 2:58 pm
by dozicusmaximus
I think I lean more toward the Sludge side of things. I got really into the doom stuff for a while. I haven't payed much attention the past 5 years. It's a bummer that a lot of bands don't seem to be trying anything new. This dude at my work is really getting into the whole doom thing. I'm giving him suggestions which is fun. He's telling me about newer bands. I'll go check them out and I'm just not into most of them. The only difference now is some bands are more retro sounding. But musical tastes change over time. There are still a bunch of albums I love from the genre.
I was raised on Hawkwind as it was one of my old mans favorite bands to trip to back in the 70s. Which probably explains why I like my doom a little more psychedelic. That being said, the new Elder is pretty bad ass.

Came across this last year. Thought it was pretty doomy, trippy, weird, awesome.
The singing in the intro could be annoying, but stick with it.
[youtube][/youtube]


Re: Man the doom movement was really disappointing.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 3:07 pm
by D.o.S.
dozicusmaximus wrote:I think I lean more toward the Sludge side of things. I got really into the doom stuff for a while. I haven't payed much attention the past 5 years. It's a bummer that a lot of bands don't seem to be trying anything new. This dude at my work is really getting into the whole doom thing. I'm giving him suggestions which is fun. He's telling me about newer bands. I'll go check them out and I'm just not into most of them. The only difference now is some bands are more retro sounding. But musical tastes change over time. There are still a bunch of albums I love from the genre.
I was raised on Hawkwind as it was one of my old mans favorite bands to trip to back in the 70s. Which probably explains why I like my doom a little more psychedelic. That being said, the new Elder is pretty bad ass.

Came across this last year. Thought it was pretty doomy, trippy, weird, awesome.
The singing in the intro could be annoying, but stick with it.

[youtube][/youtube]

Re: Man the doom movement was really disappointing.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 3:13 pm
by dozicusmaximus
Ahhh, take off the s... I figured it out. Thanks.
That band sounds like if Portal were French and from the 80s, sort of.

Re: Man the doom movement was really disappointing.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:35 pm
by D.o.S.
Excited to listen later!

Re: Man the doom movement was really disappointing.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:28 pm
by Inconuucl
I love to listen to doom/drone when doing other stuff, but most doom shows I've seen fucking put me to sleep. :idk:

Re: Man the doom movement was really disappointing.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:36 pm
by Blackened Soul
Inconuucl wrote:I love to listen to doom/drone when doing other stuff, but most doom shows I've seen fucking put me to sleep. :idk:
That's because of the amp/monster truck bull shit... Sure loud is cool but it does not make you write better songs or be interesting, it just makes you loud, that's all it does.

Re: Man the doom movement was really disappointing.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 10:08 pm
by waltdogg
after living on and off in the bay area for the last 8 years. the whole notion of oakland being a mecca of the "thriving doom scene" is a joke.

everything is so trivialized and elitist.

Re: Man the doom movement was really disappointing.

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 1:30 pm
by mathias
Trying to take this apart and understand each piece. I came back to edit the beginning here and preface it with: I'm not gonna make an argument in defense of doom. And maybe I don't understand doom enough myself to critique it. So instead, I'm gonna riff off some stuff and imagine something new that goes beyond the derivative stuff already discussed in this thread.

In particular, I'm not gonna argue with
Electric wizard sounds like some rednecks trying to start an IROC.
LOL. That's so great. :lol:

I'm thinking in particular about:
spaceship musics
It sounds like galactic civilizations are living out space operas and suns are living and dying and the universe is waiting for you
I get that people least classify themselves based on sounding like influences -- Sleep, Electric Wizard, etc.

But I'm trying to wrap my head around what it'd mean to fully embrace doom-as-spaceship-music, or even more generic, metal-as-enjoyed-by-a-galactic-civilization-with-kilometer-long-ships-and-Culture-style-AI-minds-running-the-show-while-everyone-lives-out-their-hedonistic-lives. As in, what would a "spaceships and galactic civilizations" genre sound like?

The things that characterize doom for me (and maybe other people have different ways to quantify this) are heavy and slow. For take-it-or-leave-it, where I'll leave it, is the generic-metal-allusions-to-witchcraft/Satanism and weed-jokes-as-band-names. These don't contribute anything, especially if we're going to effing space.

The heavy part comes in live as loudness, which gives us the
amp/monster truck bull shit
And isn't really an important part of the sound. Perhaps the amps are just part of the live feeling / experience. Heaviness can come from a wall of amps played live. Musically, we could also get the same sounds in a studio, with less amps. So let's say we abandon the my-amps-are-louder measuring competition and focus on sound, composition and theory. I think, in particular, that a recording with no dynamics is a boring recording.

I think the thing missing from a lot of these bands is space. As in, space between notes. A lot of the "heavy" comes from droning notes, rather than slow and sparse. I think sparse could be interesting. Think David Gilmour -- he doesn't play all the time in every Pink Floyd song. The could also come from dynamics with sparse playing, say, from reverb trails, rather than from traditional droning or feedback where we're again headed towards the "getting louder and louder until the recording is as 'loud' as it can get."

Some other things missing from my (personal) thinking on the spaceship music: synth. The bands listed as not creative, aren't using synthesis enough, I think. Dunno, would like to explore this or hear examples where it is being done. Again, we can go back to Pink Floyd, even. They were doing much more creative stuff here than most bands.

On the same vein, other instrumentation. Guitar/bass/drums.. thinking beyond orchestral hits to add something with a bow in there, or maybe horns. I don't know. You invent it.

Composition: John Williams has got an edge on these bands. Seriously. If you're going to make an hour long record, maybe have a theme that you return to. Maybe an arc or progression that everything goes through. 10-songs-5-minutes-each-on-a-record is boring, too, if they're all just little good riffs you had and you're not even gonna bother to write lyrics or tell a story with them. We can go back to classical music here. Leran you about counterpoint, and have your bass player do something other than the same bassline for 15 minutes.

We're past the age of records and CDs, and into the age of Spotify and Youtube. The length of a CD doesn't matter anymore, basically. I haven't seen it that often, but if a set is 2 hours, maybe a 2 hour recording that actually-goes-somewhere is a new format to explore. Granted, 2 hours playing is some intense BS. So maybe not. This also means that Dopesmoker is basically halfway there, :lol:

Lastly, in case anyone thought I was going to be super serious or offer useful advice: bring back the clap track. :lol:

---

That all said, and ideas exhausted, I tried to come up with some defenses of doom from recent history. The new Elder is good. And Ufomammut is good. Any others?

SubRosa is a recent discovery for me, and proves that you can be loud and heavy while bringing in some new instrumentation (violin) and have dynamics such that you can have a female vocalist (gasp).

Re: Man the doom movement was really disappointing.

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 1:55 pm
by $harkToootth
Honestly, things like Xenakis and Bela Bartok sound way more "doomier" to me than most "doom". We talked about Zbigniew Karkowski in another thread and his work is a good example or my sentiment.

Is EYEHATEGOD 'doom'?Cause I love them but I always considered that 'sludge'. Same with ACID BATH. Southern Sludge?

Re: Man the doom movement was really disappointing.

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:08 pm
by mathias
I feel like the distinction between sludge and doom is murky. Is there a clear differentiator besides personal opinion?

Re: Man the doom movement was really disappointing.

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 2:39 pm
by D.o.S.
Sludge has always been southern doom, basically. It's all the same slowed down 70's stuff.

And there's a handful of good doom records every year it's just the genre is overrun with retreads at this point, IMO.

Re: Man the doom movement was really disappointing.

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 4:14 pm
by coldbrightsunlight
D.o.S. wrote:And there's a handful of good doom records every year it's just the genre is overrun with retreads at this point, IMO.
I agree. Haven't heard any of this year's yet though. :lol:

Re: Man the doom movement was really disappointing.

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 12:20 am
by dozicusmaximus
Doom before doom
Hell of a performance.
[youtube][/youtube]