Re: Amps: Combo or Head & Cab - which is better & why?
Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2017 12:54 pm
Condensed quoting:
Combo amps make up more business for repair techs than heads. But it's mostly due to the inverted amp chassis absorbing all the waste heat from the tubes, transformers and so on. All the components run hot, near the limit (or beyond) of their maximum operating temp range. That shortens their lifespan. Esp in summer, esp in crowded venues, attics etc. Most heads have bottom-mounted chassis where the heat can rise up away from everything.
Fenders are the outlier with top-mounted, inverted chassis like most combo amps; and so is my Selmer (which I use upside-down)
The proximity of tubes to the speakers and the amp chassis being directly coupled to the speaker baffle, does lead to annoying rattle in combos... and tubes going microphonic sooner than similar head+cab setups with buffering material between them.
Also in small combo amps, you're going to be cranking them, which eats up the life of tubes at a rapider rate.
Combo amps aren't bad, they're just more cumbersome due to center of gravity. If you think an AC30 or Twin is a pain, I have a SFQR which is a half stack version
But sometimes open-back just isn't appropriate for #soundgoals
TL;DR
Both rule.
NSFW: show
Fenders are the outlier with top-mounted, inverted chassis like most combo amps; and so is my Selmer (which I use upside-down)
The proximity of tubes to the speakers and the amp chassis being directly coupled to the speaker baffle, does lead to annoying rattle in combos... and tubes going microphonic sooner than similar head+cab setups with buffering material between them.
Also in small combo amps, you're going to be cranking them, which eats up the life of tubes at a rapider rate.
Combo amps aren't bad, they're just more cumbersome due to center of gravity. If you think an AC30 or Twin is a pain, I have a SFQR which is a half stack version
But sometimes open-back just isn't appropriate for #soundgoals
TL;DR
Both rule.