Page 4 of 5

Re: Full featured multi delay vs. Booteex quirky delays

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 8:08 pm
by rustywire
repoman wrote:Give me a one trick pony that does its trick very well over a jack of all trades every time, with everything: pedals, guitars, amps. I always seem to keep the thing that has a distinct character over something thats more versatile but bland(er).
This is how I lean as well. I feel like when I find that '1 thing' part of the fun is seeing how far it can be pushed, hacked even.

I don't need 50 delay sounds in 1 pedal. Just give me a DMM and I'll make do with that. I'll sooner add another delay to it than try for an all-in-one multi fx solution. Not that I have anything against multis...
For a nice compliment to the DMM I'd like to reclaim a Boss PS-2/3 or DD-7. I loathe submenus in gear unless they're a necessity [my hardware samplers]

Re: Full featured multi delay vs. Booteex quirky delays

Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 9:39 pm
by psychic vampire.
Hmm. Of a semi-opposite mindset. But also for a whole electronic mix. For drum machines, synths, tape loops, vocals, give me two timebenders or jack of several trades that I can throw where ever i need them and give me one or two or such weirdies, for when I want the particle on a tape loop or a pitch shifting delay on vocals. Call it a day. Had a huge delay and fuzz quest in 2015. Found what worked and what didn't. Gonna move on.

Re: Full featured multi delay vs. Booteex quirky delays

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 3:23 am
by fcknoise
I'm way overboard with delays on my board too. RV-3>PDS8000 (to be changed for a CT5)>mem loss> el cap > don't know if either space or pitchfactor counts > timebender.

Timebender is pretty much my ultimate "do-it-all"-delay. I realize that it isn't nearly as deep as the timeline/timefactor/dd-500 but I like that there isn't any real menu diving. Such a simple setup and so many features.

Re: Full featured multi delay vs. Booteex quirky delays

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 3:50 am
by Iommic Pope
Dude, you get some bad ass sounds out of that board for what you're doing.
I'd be content with that shit.

Re: Full featured multi delay vs. Booteex quirky delays

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:42 am
by goroth
Couldn't agree more.

Re: Full featured multi delay vs. Booteex quirky delays

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 5:46 am
by PlasticPeople
I see the merit in both options. Right now I'm using an H9 to cover most delay duties and a Judder for its' textural, bitcrushed repeats when the sample time is set long. I thought the H9 would involve a lot of menu diving but the Windows/iOS app makes using it very easy.

Re: Full featured multi delay vs. Booteex quirky delays

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 7:33 am
by fcknoise
Aw thanks duders. I am pretty content with my delays and verbs for now. Pretty content overall, actually

Re: Full featured multi delay vs. Booteex quirky delays

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 11:49 am
by Jero
This thread caused me to buy a Timefactor yesterday.
...well not really, but that's my excuse.

Re: Full featured multi delay vs. Booteex quirky delays

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 2:32 pm
by resincum
timefactor rules. does some funky shit when you push the feedback to 100-110% with short delay :love:

I think it was on the tape mode..sounded like a whale.

Re: Full featured multi delay vs. Booteex quirky delays

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 5:39 pm
by Jero
resincum wrote:timefactor rules. does some funky shit when you push the feedback to 100-110% with short delay :love:
I think it was on the tape mode..sounded like a whale.
I'll have to try that. It has way too much tweak-ability for what I'm used to :eek: ...but I couldn't pass it up for the price, and local too.

Re: Full featured multi delay vs. Booteex quirky delays

Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 5:41 pm
by Jwar
Imagine having an H9! The Timefactor is soooooooo much easier to tweak that way. Algo's at your fingertips bro!! No menu diving at all.

What I'm saying is you need an H9.

Re: Full featured multi delay vs. Booteex quirky delays

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 3:19 am
by Purple Colored Rock
This thread couldn't come in a better time for me. I'm selling my Akai Headrush and jap DD-3, thinking of maybe getting a DD-500, Timebender or Avanlanche run and keeping a PS-3 and PDS 20/20 Multiplay.

Re: Full featured multi delay vs. Booteex quirky delays

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 3:56 am
by ognoy
I'm sort of in the middle.
I have the Pitchfactor for presets I need during a set. Long digital delays, slapback, "Crystal"-delay, pitch shifted delay, etc.
And I also have a Memory Man-ish delay(Mad bean design) which is use for more on the fly tweaking delay, oscillation, etc.

Re: Full featured multi delay vs. Booteex quirky delays

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 6:06 am
by psychic vampire.
I say this all the time about synths; both have a place in my heart/setup. Presets are wildly useful for a song part that need to be consistent, but no presets encourages me to go into the great unknown. Why choose? I feel this way about delays. The ONLY shortcomings on the timebender are occassional volume problems, and i could want more than 4 presets. Non preset delays will rarely be the same and that is why I love them.

Re: Full featured multi delay vs. Booteex quirky delays

Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 12:39 pm
by rfurtkamp
Yea, Timebender I'd have killed for a rackmount version with more presets, midi control, and some deep (optional) editing.