Re: three reverbs = overkill?
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 12:21 pm
yesMike wrote:Is it right that the Supernatural can do full wet signal?echodeluxe wrote:I'm deciding between the rv-5 or a supernatural
Page 4 of 4
Re: three reverbs = overkill?
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 2:32 pm
a 64 tube reverb unit and a supernatural.... moar is required
Re: three reverbs = overkill?
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 2:36 pm
Technically I have four I think? So no, it's not overkill. 
It's like fuzz. Need moar no matter what!!!
It's like fuzz. Need moar no matter what!!!Re: three reverbs = overkill?
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 7:15 pm
New name: 3verbdeluxe
(The answer is no)
(The answer is no)
Re: three reverbs = overkill?
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 11:09 pm
I'm looking to add one more in the fashion of a combo delay and verb pedal in the coming while. I know there are a ton now a days, just trying to dig around and find what overlaps the least with what I have going on and all that jazz.
Re: three reverbs = overkill?
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 1:31 pm
fart
Re: three reverbs = overkill?
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 2:13 pm
With reverb, that would be "ffaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrttttttttttttt-t-t-t-t-t-t-tt-t-t--tt--tt-tt-t..."echodeluxe wrote:fart
Re: three reverbs = overkill?
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 12:27 pm
mmm...baconBrandsmannen wrote:I thought I had kind of overkill reverb, but I realize now that I totally need more. I have an early cathedral, which I mostly use in conjunction with distortion (I find that colder/more digital reverbs work great with that), for MBV-ish reverse reverb stuff and it also doubles as a freeze pedal (infinite mod thing). Then there are a few delays between that and my eventide space, which I really use for all other reverb applications. Oh, and there is reverb on the el Capistan as well, but I mostly don't use it. I have an RV-3, and a liquid ambience on my want list.