ilovefuzz.com

I saw this another forum.
Who do they think they are fooling saying they are targeting working musicians?
No working musician (who plans on getting more work) would show up to a gig with one of these.
I'm not really sure what they think they're doing here.
I'm legitimately pretty confused!

devnulljp wrote:So....can we legitimately ask is Henry Juszkiewicz secretly working for Fender?

I lol'd IRL.

I think it's cool to evolve with time, age, fashion, etc... but I think Gibson misses the point with all the new designs.....

They have gone stranger in the past.

One day I’ll build a bass version of this but with a Thunderbird head stock.
I think it would look very coll.

MM

metalmariachi wrote:They have gone stranger in the past.

GibsonModerne1.jpg

One day I’ll build a bass version of this but with a Thunderbird head stock.
I think it would look very coll.

MM

That would be the shit.

There was a builder in the 90's that did a headless bass version that had normal tuners mounted in the body, name escapes me....

metalmariachi wrote:They have gone stranger in the past.

GibsonModerne1.jpg

One day I’ll build a bass version of this but with a Thunderbird head stock.
I think it would look very coll.

MM

But this kind of strange looks way better in my opinion!

Toonster wrote:

metalmariachi wrote:They have gone stranger in the past.

GibsonModerne1.jpg

One day I’ll build a bass version of this but with a Thunderbird head stock.
I think it would look very coll.

MM

But this kind of strange looks way better in my opinion!

I agree, I like Modernes, I got to play a Ibanez lawsuit on once man what a guitar! Also the Moderne shape was draw by Ted McCarty You can't get much more mojo than that

yeah, and they DID have that one, whose name escapes me, that was basically a firebird as drawn by someone sloshed out of their mind.

What era you talkin' aboot? You mean a RD Artist, those are cool, they weigh a ton and had moogness inside of them.

i think they're oogleh.

also not much of a fan of active electronics on guitars

On the guitars... yeah... actually I tend to forget there even was a guitar version... But the Bass version I like active on bass, I like moog, I like kooky shapes so RD bass = win

dunno what it is about bass, but we get away with the kookiest shapes... BC Rich excluded >_>

and yeah. active electronics and bass are wonderful, particularly Lakland and G&L's circuits. there is NOTHING you can't do on those.

Mudfuzz wrote:What era you talkin' aboot? You mean a RD Artist, those are cool, they weigh a ton and had moogness inside of them.

The RD Artist is my white whale of basses. I will perpetually want one.

Gearmond wrote:dunno what it is about bass, but we get away with the kookiest shapes... BC Rich excluded >_>

and yeah. active electronics and bass are wonderful, particularly Lakland and G&L's circuits. there is NOTHING you can't do on those.

Yeah I agree, both are really cool!

theavondon wrote:

Mudfuzz wrote:What era you talkin' aboot? You mean a RD Artist, those are cool, they weigh a ton and had moogness inside of them.

The RD Artist is my white whale of basses. I will perpetually want one.

ESP makes a white one.... but I don't think it has the same type of electronics..

Mudfuzz wrote:

theavondon wrote:

Mudfuzz wrote:What era you talkin' aboot? You mean a RD Artist, those are cool, they weigh a ton and had moogness inside of them.

The RD Artist is my white whale of basses. I will perpetually want one.

ESP makes a white one.... but I don't think it has the same type of electronics..

I know. My dad had one in the seventies. It weighed fifteen pounds.

http://www.espguitars.co.jp/artist/toshiya/index.html