ilovefuzz.com

i want to plug it into my TEAC

futuresailors wrote:BLOWING UP TO BLOWING UP DEMO PLZ!

sorry for the delayed response. tried it and it's not much except for a slight change in EQ a little more gain and lots more noise (since the noise floor is now being boost like 10000000db with both running)

Just curious... you mentioned that you gave a "tip of the hat" to the SHO. So how would you (or anyone else that owns one) compare the Blowing Up to the SHO?

elbandito wrote:Just curious... you mentioned that you gave a "tip of the hat" to the SHO. So how would you (or anyone else that owns one) compare the Blowing Up to the SHO?

The SHO, to my ears, add a toffee like crackle to the top end of the signal. TO the same ears I hear a much louder boost in Blowing Up, a demphasis in the top end, and a buttery creamy fudge simmer to the low end.

lawrence scaduto wrote:

elbandito wrote:Just curious... you mentioned that you gave a "tip of the hat" to the SHO. So how would you (or anyone else that owns one) compare the Blowing Up to the SHO?

The SHO, to my ears, add a toffee like crackle to the top end of the signal. TO the same ears I hear a much louder boost in Blowing Up, a demphasis in the top end, and a buttery creamy fudge simmer to the low end.

A de-emphasis? Is that to say that Blowing Up actually takes off some highs or rather that it just doesn't emphasize them as much as compared to the SHO?

Also, you've touched my sweet tooth with your description. I think I'll have the gf make me some cookies.

elbandito wrote:

lawrence scaduto wrote:

elbandito wrote:Just curious... you mentioned that you gave a "tip of the hat" to the SHO. So how would you (or anyone else that owns one) compare the Blowing Up to the SHO?

The SHO, to my ears, add a toffee like crackle to the top end of the signal. TO the same ears I hear a much louder boost in Blowing Up, a demphasis in the top end, and a buttery creamy fudge simmer to the low end.

A de-emphasis? Is that to say that Blowing Up actually takes off some highs or rather that it just doesn't emphasize them as much as compared to the SHO?

Also, you've touched my sweet tooth with your description. I think I'll have the gf make me some cookies.

I think we're getting a little caught up in the nuance of language here. to simplify: blowing up does not sound as bright as the SHO.

we all know blowing up can make your shit way louder, but can it make your shit just a little louder?

bobloblah wrote:we all know blowing up can make your shit way louder, but can it make your shit just a little louder?

blowing up + plane ticket plus = explosions in your amp

bobloblah wrote:we all know blowing up can make your shit way louder, but can it make your shit just a little louder?

no. it's not meant to be subtle.

Coolest pedal intro/demo ever.

think everyone who has posted on this thread has asked at lesat once what one blowing up going into another blowing up will sound like

I love ohnoho videos... they're fantastic!

So i just got mine.
And its sikkkkkkkkkkkkkk

BUT
i live in a dorm. and my amp is 40 tube watts.
THEREFOR
i cannot use it.
at all.
until i get to the practice space.

how does this sound in the loop of a chk chk boom

I love my blowing up, oh so much. Putting it inside the feedback loop of my Utter Stutter (with it as the only active pedal) makes the greatest low end thump. I had L add a momentary switch on mine and it makes for awesomeeeee delay swells. I'm tempted to buy another to put outside of the Utter Stutter...

I also LOVE the way it sounds before OR after my Big Muff. Such delicious walls.

Am I the only one enjoying the irony of Quiet Things love for the Blowing Up?