Re: Holy PLL clone
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2016 5:12 pm
#KatrinaPiersonHistory
zetamkiii wrote:You just don't get it do you? You can't ask someone to build you this. This is a mans masterpiece.tuffteef wrote:feel free to build one for us then
If you had been paying attention you would have noticed an emerging new kind of pedal.
Through the duck tape, booby traps and chaos you would have glimpsed the true nature behind John Schumann's original design.
This is the very pedal that caused him to give up building after completing only a few units.
Years ago, I remember hearing a customer sent his Pll back for repair and after 3 months of waiting received an unusual email.
I am not lying when I tell you this. It was revealed that Schumann, who had never kept a Pll for himself, had over the
years forgotten the design and fell in love with the customers pedal, attempting to run off with it.
This is not the mark of a regular builder. You see, I've encountered few pedals like this.
Each pedal is a meticulous labor of love. It's eccentric genius cannot be held to the same standard as a regular boutique.
It is the pinnacle of unobtainium. A boutique boutique where the builder has poured his very soul into what he is creating to
the point it transcends itself and becomes art. This is the shit legends are made of.
You do not understand what's happening. To simply have someone else build you one is an insult to this mans art.
If you don't appreciate it enough build your own interpretation then you do not understand what is it, you cannot comprehend what you
are playing and you don't deserve it.
Naw, The PLL is just a pedal, even Schumann copied from somewhere. It's just that that paragraph is the closest ILF has to a copypasta.Antlerface wrote:I'm perfectly content owning a forgery, so long as it admits exactly what it is... A forgery. A copy.
I would be lying if I said I didn't intend to build one for myself, but I'm too damn impatient and want to use one now.
This is going to be a placeholder until I build something similar.
I don't know what that is but I think the most pertinent/cultural quote comes from dearly beloved tuffteef:Inconuucl wrote:It's just that that paragraph is the closest ILF has to a copypasta.
tuffteef wrote:no wait i have to say it
you are so retarded
you act like schumann invented the bloody PLL
PLL is used for so many applications including Audio conversion and Radio Tracking
people have been using PLL for synthesis for ages before he came along
his PLL is literally just a PLL..
no secrets no tricks
literally a PLL
goroth wrote:Damn it MLC, you always drink the last of the unicorn blood!
Seeing how the original PLL ran at the same voltage than eurorack does, that's not far off mark, actually.Antlerface wrote:Strange Tales might be onto something..
Aside from the glitch and synth tones, the dual pll circuit of the Schummann provides a HUGE sound that can either achieve really punishing fuzz tones or really unguitarlike synth tones, almost like an angry theremin. Because of this the tracking circuit is paramount, to have a weak one severely limits the versatility of the pedal.autopilot wrote:some questions for the pll users (those who had, those that has one and for those who lust for one).
what is the attractiveness of the pll (wackyness, glitchness, unprecditable, newness in terms of sounds, etc)?
what features are a must have in one and which ones you dont/didnt care?
how important is the lock/track? (i dont mind a glitch but i also dont like to have a random oscillator ruling my toanz)
what type of sound are you trying to achieve with one?
Attractiveness, for me at least, is the uniqueness of the whole package. There aren't a whole lot of damn near unclassifiable effects out there.autopilot wrote:some questions for the pll users (those who had, those that has one and for those who lust for one).
what is the attractiveness of the pll (wackyness, glitchness, unprecditable, newness in terms of sounds, etc)?
what features are a must have in one and which ones you dont/didnt care?
how important is the lock/track? (i dont mind a glitch but i also dont like to have a random oscillator ruling my toanz)
what type of sound are you trying to achieve with one?
For me it's the sheer beef of the sound, hefty, thick slab of synth, and that it is in itself a massively varied box of unique sounds. Fuzz, synth, glitch, phase, filter, slow attack, envelope filter etc......autopilot wrote:some questions for the pll users (those who had, those that has one and for those who lust for one).
what is the attractiveness of the pll (wackyness, glitchness, unprecditable, newness in terms of sounds, etc)?
what features are a must have in one and which ones you dont/didnt care?
how important is the lock/track? (i dont mind a glitch but i also dont like to have a random oscillator ruling my toanz)
what type of sound are you trying to achieve with one?