Page 3 of 4
Re: EQD Transmisser reverb
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 3:53 pm
by cherler
Inconuucl wrote:;;cry
coupleonapkins wrote:cherler wrote:coupleonapkins wrote:
I wish they would do this w/ the Afterneath, too, which is the main appeal of that pedal for me.
You could maybe
mod in an expression pedal. I've been thinking about doing it for the drag control.
Matt Weed is the coolest! It seems like a lot of people have modded their Afterneath for EXP (hard to believe it's nearly 2 years since it came out & I still don't have one
), which is why I'm kind of wondering why EQD never considered revising the build a la a V2 (but maybe I'm more alone in my thinking
). Also, I'm spoiled that so many other ILF-friendly builders basically cater to those kind of requests in the first place, soooooo.........
EQD def outgrew ILF.
I'm almost sure that the EQD guys said they didn't want to add EXP in because it only sounds good with subtle changes or something like that.
Whaaaaat? Going wild with that knob is half the fun of the pedal...
Re: EQD Transmisser reverb
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:53 pm
by Meriphew
Would be cool if EQD would build a big box super reverb pedal that had all their verbs in one box with presets.
Re: EQD Transmisser reverb
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:56 pm
by D.o.S.
cherler wrote:Inconuucl wrote:;;cry
coupleonapkins wrote:cherler wrote:coupleonapkins wrote:
I wish they would do this w/ the Afterneath, too, which is the main appeal of that pedal for me.
You could maybe
mod in an expression pedal. I've been thinking about doing it for the drag control.
Matt Weed is the coolest! It seems like a lot of people have modded their Afterneath for EXP (hard to believe it's nearly 2 years since it came out & I still don't have one
), which is why I'm kind of wondering why EQD never considered revising the build a la a V2 (but maybe I'm more alone in my thinking
). Also, I'm spoiled that so many other ILF-friendly builders basically cater to those kind of requests in the first place, soooooo.........
EQD def outgrew ILF.
I'm almost sure that the EQD guys said they didn't want to add EXP in because it only sounds good with subtle changes or something like that.
Whaaaaat? Going wild with that knob is half the fun of the pedal...
Is the Third Hand still in production?
Re: EQD Transmisser reverb
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:56 pm
by Disarm D'arcy
Meriphew wrote:Would be cool if EQD would build a big box super reverb pedal that had all their verbs in one box with presets.
Re: EQD Transmisser reverb
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 5:59 pm
by cherler
D.o.S. wrote:
Is the Third Hand still in production?
Doesn't look like it, I didn't even know that was a thing
Re: EQD Transmisser reverb
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 6:21 pm
by jrfox92
D.o.S. wrote:
Is the Third Hand still in production?
Oh, shit, I remember seeing those a while back and thinking, "damn, I want one of those."
Re: EQD Transmisser reverb
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 11:18 pm
by coupleonapkins
Re: EQD Transmisser reverb
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2016 12:05 am
by oscillateur
Just like the Afterneath (which I bought when it got released and traded quickly after that), from the demos it makes me think that this would be a great pedal for me if I could spend a few hours with the code to tweak a few things first. Also, resonant filters sweeps are usually quite boring, controlling almost any other parameter with the exp input would have been more interesting I think.
It might be better than the afterneath though, I'll wait until I can try one or see a video where we can see how it behaves with low decay until I for a proper opinion
.
Re: EQD Transmisser reverb
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2016 7:14 pm
by Inconuucl
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rTgcy4Ce1U[/youtube]
The more demo vids I see the less interested I become.
Re: EQD Transmisser reverb
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2016 8:49 pm
by popvulture
I had a Third Hand, wasn't that awesome. Think it might still be in my garage, haha...
But shit yes this thing sounds lovely—EQD indeed are bringing it recently. Gray Channel's still the best pedal I've procured in quite a while.
Re: EQD Transmisser reverb
Posted: Sun Sep 18, 2016 11:26 pm
by jrfox92
Inconuucl wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rTgcy4Ce1U[/youtube]
The more demo vids I see the less interested I become.
+1
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaqlNwujXWA[/youtube]
Once I watched Henning's demo/review it pretty much killed any GAS I might've potentially had.
When I realized how boring and gimmicky it sounded
to my ears it just killed all interest.
It sounds (
to me) like they just added a phaser (obviously it's a filter, but whatever) in the reverb's effects loop.
It's cool and all, I suppose. But I'd much rather have a spacious reverb with an effects loop than something that would barely ever get used like this.
Re: EQD Transmisser reverb
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 2:41 am
by weebles
Is this going to turn into 15 pages of people bitching about EQD ripping off consumers because they don't put every reverb they produce into one pedal, or so they get a pass because they aren't considered "hipsters"?
Re: EQD Transmisser reverb
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 4:35 am
by Inconuucl
weebles wrote:Is this going to turn into 15 pages of people bitching about EQD ripping off consumers because they don't put every reverb they produce into one pedal, or so they get a pass because they aren't considered "hipsters"?
Naw, we're well aware (at least I am) that we are niche customers with too many pedals, it's cool of this is somebody's sound.
Re: EQD Transmisser reverb
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 8:19 am
by Disarm D'arcy
weebles wrote:Is this going to turn into 15 pages of people bitching about EQD ripping off consumers because they don't put every reverb they produce into one pedal, or so they get a pass because they aren't considered "hipsters"?
We totally should
Re: EQD Transmisser reverb
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2016 10:41 am
by Jwar
weebles wrote:Is this going to turn into 15 pages of people bitching about EQD ripping off consumers because they don't put every reverb they produce into one pedal, or so they get a pass because they aren't considered "hipsters"?
I could see that happening. ILF is the new TGP...jk kind of.
jrfox92 wrote:Inconuucl wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rTgcy4Ce1U[/youtube]
The more demo vids I see the less interested I become.
+1
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaqlNwujXWA[/youtube]
Once I watched Henning's demo/review it pretty much killed any GAS I might've potentially had.
When you realize how boring and gimmicky is sounds it just kills all interest.
It sounds like they just added a phaser (obviously it's a filter, but whatever) in the reverb's effects loop.
It's cool and all, I suppose. But I'd much rather have a spacious reverb with an effects loop than something that would barely ever get used like this.
I'm going to offer a DOS solution.
Don't buy it.
