ilovefuzz.com

bloatedsack wrote:

Iommic Pope wrote: Not all of us want to play an instrument that looks like its original intent was to be a dildo for Liza Minnelli.

I do. Which one do I need to buy for that?

This one.
I believe it was supposed to be marketed as the "Gibson 2016 Minnelli signature model Glitterdonger".

fuckers copied me fuck you gibson!

Iommic Pope wrote: I believe it was supposed to be marketed as the "Gibson 2016 Minnelli signature model Glitterdonger".

Stop it with the quotable shit dude!
You're making me LOL.

Looks cool enough to me. Like my 2014 LP MM, a cheap modding platform. I fucking love that guitar, and it was written off by just about everyone. I suspect this is the same case.

(and i actually love that headstock)

antennafarm wrote:(and i actually love that headstock)

I've been lead to understand that so does Liza Minnelli.

(I also just learned, while ensuring Ms. Minnelli was still alive, that her mom was Judy Garland. I never knew!)

Just click your heels three times and say " Judy Garland was a scabby heroin addict"

Aquietcabin1978 wrote:Put a Bigsby on that sucker and I would hit it.

But a Bigsby makes anything & anyone hittable.
So please don't go putting a Bigsby on my mum!
Any of my relatives for that matter....

But one day, one day my Reverend will get a B5....

So many antiques I would rather deface my guitar with than a bigsby:





Just bolt one of those suckers on that Firebird Zero and hope my blues licks pick up that vintage patina.

If I didn't already have bucker guitars coming out my ass, I'd be interested. I've seen and played more hideous things than that.

Gibson has been making decent stuff the last couple years I've been in the market to a point I have a bit of faith I didn't used to possess.