Re: Fender Rascal Bass
Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 5:28 pm
Your shitty pics look great, Schnikes.
Holy Schnikes wrote: not sure why they go that route so frequently.
The Custom Shop Masterbuilder who designed the original was responsible for every detail. It's a Guild Starfire bridge and it's actually very functional and makes intonation a breeze. Guess he just admired the look. He explains it some in this vid:foomanfat wrote:I wonder whose idea was that bridge plate. It just seems so wonky and unlike anything else Fender does.
I never minded heel adjustment, but I do hate it when they make it a Hex nut… the old slotted ones are better… on basses anyway.. I have never needed to loosen the neck on my old P Bass, a small flathead screw driver always worksHoly Schnikes wrote:Yeah, I agree angled Gibson headstocks are in constant danger with that truss rod placement due to lack of wood mass near the adjustment point but Fenders lack that angle. I've never seen a broken Fender headstock that wasn't intentional or the result of being insanely careless, even those with headstock truss adjustment. They're just beefier all around due to design.
Regardless, heel truss doesn't bother me anymore. Not that difficult to adjust and def a more stout option.
Aha, interesting. A Fender amalgam of weirdo 60s basses. The idea definitely brings the look together, in my mind.Holy Schnikes wrote:The Custom Shop Masterbuilder who designed the original was responsible for every detail. It's a Guild Starfire bridge and it's actually very functional and makes intonation a breeze. Guess he just admired the look. He explains it some in this vid:foomanfat wrote:I wonder whose idea was that bridge plate. It just seems so wonky and unlike anything else Fender does.
[youtube]http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2oyOQY7KGtY[/youtube]
You only gave to look at a Gibson headstock the wrong way and it breaks. One of the worst headstock joint designs on a guitar ever. Especially on a set neck guitar.Mudfuzz wrote:Holy Schnikes wrote: not sure why they go that route so frequently.
not saying they are right.. or wrong but that is why.
There's definitely enough room to pluck and get some high pitched notes and noise but obviously nothing like the room offered on an offset-style trem.kbithecrowing wrote:Bumpin with a question for mr Shnicksss: is there enough space behind the bridge to pluck the strings and make noise?
I love short scale basses and being able to make noise behind the bridge of a jazzmaster, so im just wondering if this could fulfill both of my desires
Definitely.kbithecrowing wrote:Yeah I figured. Enough to get some metallic shreiking through some fuzz?