Page 3 of 3

Re: Fender Rascal Bass

Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 5:28 pm
by Chankgeez
Your shitty pics look great, Schnikes.

Re: Fender Rascal Bass

Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 8:20 pm
by Mudfuzz
Holy Schnikes wrote: not sure why they go that route so frequently.
Image
not saying they are right.. or wrong but that is why.

Re: Fender Rascal Bass

Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 8:44 pm
by Holy Schnikes
Yeah, I agree angled Gibson headstocks are in constant danger with that truss rod placement due to lack of wood mass near the adjustment point but Fenders lack that angle. I've never seen a broken Fender headstock that wasn't intentional or the result of being insanely careless, even those with headstock truss adjustment. They're just beefier all around due to design.

Regardless, heel truss doesn't bother me anymore. Not that difficult to adjust and def a more stout option.

Re: Fender Rascal Bass

Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 8:51 pm
by foomanfat
I wonder whose idea was that bridge plate. It just seems so wonky and unlike anything else Fender does.

Re: Fender Rascal Bass

Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:11 pm
by Holy Schnikes
foomanfat wrote:I wonder whose idea was that bridge plate. It just seems so wonky and unlike anything else Fender does.
The Custom Shop Masterbuilder who designed the original was responsible for every detail. It's a Guild Starfire bridge and it's actually very functional and makes intonation a breeze. Guess he just admired the look. He explains it some in this vid:

[youtube]http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2oyOQY7KGtY[/youtube]

Re: Fender Rascal Bass

Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:28 pm
by Mudfuzz
Holy Schnikes wrote:Yeah, I agree angled Gibson headstocks are in constant danger with that truss rod placement due to lack of wood mass near the adjustment point but Fenders lack that angle. I've never seen a broken Fender headstock that wasn't intentional or the result of being insanely careless, even those with headstock truss adjustment. They're just beefier all around due to design.

Regardless, heel truss doesn't bother me anymore. Not that difficult to adjust and def a more stout option.
I never minded heel adjustment, but I do hate it when they make it a Hex nut… the old slotted ones are better… on basses anyway.. I have never needed to loosen the neck on my old P Bass, a small flathead screw driver always works :thumb:

Re: Fender Rascal Bass

Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:35 pm
by foomanfat
Holy Schnikes wrote:
foomanfat wrote:I wonder whose idea was that bridge plate. It just seems so wonky and unlike anything else Fender does.
The Custom Shop Masterbuilder who designed the original was responsible for every detail. It's a Guild Starfire bridge and it's actually very functional and makes intonation a breeze. Guess he just admired the look. He explains it some in this vid:

[youtube]http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2oyOQY7KGtY[/youtube]
Aha, interesting. A Fender amalgam of weirdo 60s basses. The idea definitely brings the look together, in my mind.

Re: Fender Rascal Bass

Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2014 3:35 am
by KaosCill8r
Mudfuzz wrote:
Holy Schnikes wrote: not sure why they go that route so frequently.
Image
not saying they are right.. or wrong but that is why.
You only gave to look at a Gibson headstock the wrong way and it breaks. One of the worst headstock joint designs on a guitar ever. Especially on a set neck guitar.

Re: Fender Rascal Bass

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 3:13 pm
by univalve
Ok, now i'm interested in trying that bass out.
Color Looks great BTW.

Re: Fender Rascal Bass

Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 1:22 am
by Fuzzy Picklez
I had a chance to try one and really liked it. Glad you're digging yours.
I only had a chance to run it through an Orange Terror bass, but even through that it sounded pretty good.
Diggin' the weird shapes.

Re: Fender Rascal Bass

Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 11:31 am
by kbit
Bumpin with a question for mr Shnicksss: is there enough space behind the bridge to pluck the strings and make noise?

I love short scale basses and being able to make noise behind the bridge of a jazzmaster, so im just wondering if this could fulfill both of my desires :)

Re: Fender Rascal Bass

Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 6:39 pm
by Holy Schnikes
kbithecrowing wrote:Bumpin with a question for mr Shnicksss: is there enough space behind the bridge to pluck the strings and make noise?

I love short scale basses and being able to make noise behind the bridge of a jazzmaster, so im just wondering if this could fulfill both of my desires :)
There's definitely enough room to pluck and get some high pitched notes and noise but obviously nothing like the room offered on an offset-style trem.

Re: Fender Rascal Bass

Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:17 pm
by kbit
Yeah I figured. Enough to get some metallic shreiking through some fuzz?

Re: Fender Rascal Bass

Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 4:51 pm
by Holy Schnikes
kbithecrowing wrote:Yeah I figured. Enough to get some metallic shreiking through some fuzz?
Definitely. :thumb:

Re: Fender Rascal Bass

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 9:45 pm
by kbit
Guh. Gassin'. Im gonna have to try to scope one out locally to see if I like the way it feels because everything seems sweet on paper. Except that perloid guard. Bleck.