Re: Greetings from PureSalem Guitars ...
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 9:58 pm
Congratulations and thank you for half-heartedly answering my questions.
Chankgeez wrote:...............................QUESTION
When the lion is sleeping, never try to wake him, baby.ryan summit wrote:Chankgeez wrote:...............................QUESTION
i don't mean to sound condescending here (and now i do after saying this, haha), but i'll attempt to answer your unanswered question! as far as weight goes, mahogany is generally a little heavier than alder. so for example, if you've held a fender mustang, made with an alder body, you might imagine that a guitar of similar proportions, like the reverberation model, would be possibly a pound heavier, but it all depends on the wood itself. a light piece of mahogany might be lighter than a very dense alder body. but generally these guitars are made out of wood, not metal or any weird material, so you can probably look at pictures of them and get an idea of what they weigh.Chankgeez wrote:Congratulations and thank you for half-heartedly answering my questions.
Thanks, transients, your answer isn't condescending at all, but you're making generalizations. I was looking for specific weights of the different PureSalem models. At least you tried to answer. I know individual guitars are gonna have slightly variable weights, but some manufacturers do list an average weight on their websites. I find that helpful.transients wrote:i don't mean to sound condescending here (and now i do after saying this, haha), but i'll attempt to answer your unanswered question! as far as weight goes, mahogany is generally a little heavier than alder. so for example, if you've held a fender mustang, made with an alder body, you might imagine that a guitar of similar proportions, like the reverberation model, would be possibly a pound heavier, but it all depends on the wood itself. a light piece of mahogany might be lighter than a very dense alder body. but generally these guitars are made out of wood, not metal or any weird material, so you can probably look at pictures of them and get an idea of what they weigh.Chankgeez wrote:Congratulations and thank you for half-heartedly answering my questions.
but yeah, he should probably toss a general weight range in the specs for each model, also more specific neck measurements please! like what depth is the c shape neck?
transients wrote: more specific neck measurements please! like what depth is the c shape neck?
Good luck getting a response here.THEBEERHAMMER wrote:transients wrote: more specific neck measurements please! like what depth is the c shape neck?
Yeah, I sympathize with him though since I've been in similar situations... when you're launching a company as a one or two-man army, trying to do 50 things at once, it's hard enough to find the spare time to treat paying customers right, let alone all the forum threads he started, facebook messages, etc etc. He at least answered your bigsby questionChankgeez wrote:Good luck getting a response here.THEBEERHAMMER wrote:transients wrote: more specific neck measurements please! like what depth is the c shape neck?
I understand they're probably busy with their launch and stuff, but if you're gonna post on a forum, you should probably expect to get questioned on things you post.

Bellyheart wrote:Reverberation mmmmmmmm