Page 3 of 7
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:23 pm
by julius_deane
Bronzetalon would say "top mount jacks", but I'd just be happy with the in, out, and power not all being on different sides.
Also, everything should have a built-in boost, even if it's just trim pot. Gen 5 Echo, Brigadier, etc. are great examples of this.
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:33 pm
by mathias
julius_deane wrote:Bronzetalon would say "top mount jacks", but I'd just be happy with the in, out, and power not all being on different sides.
Also, everything should have a built-in boost, even if it's just trim pot. Gen 5 Echo, Brigadier, etc. are great examples of this.
+1 to boost in everything.
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:37 pm
by skullservant
with the option of pre or post boost, especially on fuzzes. It's not hard to wire up with a 4dpt switch either
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:40 pm
by mathias
And SHO's, LPB's, etc are super simple circuits and fit in tiny places. Cheap parts, too.
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:41 pm
by skullservant
yep!! Exactly.
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 12:50 pm
by Officer Bukowski
Achtane wrote:Momentary feedback switches on non-diy delays
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 1:31 pm
by Dark Barn
More pedals with variable high pass filters for cleaning up the low end. I love this feature on my Timeline and my former Polytope. I think a few fuzzes that use clean blend would benefit more from a HPF implementation instead, you just don't see many builders doing it.
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 1:35 pm
by fungalattack
shouldn't there just be momentary feedback switches on every pedal?
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 1:39 pm
by mathias
I know that people like lots of controls with a very wide range, especially sounds that are just plain weird, out there, never before heard..
But sometimes I just wish for simple pedals that sound really good on any settings, and always stack well with other pedals. Like, always musical and never sounding wrong in context. Granted, that's a totally subjective and impossible-to-prove thing.
Most cheap/simple pedals don't actually sound good all the time, in fact, most of the time they don't play well with others and sound pretty gross.
So that's my "I wish": I wish for a line of simpler pedals that always sound good.
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 1:53 pm
by 01010111
mathias wrote:I know that people like lots of controls with a very wide range, especially sounds that are just plain weird, out there, never before heard..
But sometimes I just wish for simple pedals that sound really good on any settings, and always stack well with other pedals. Like, always musical and never sounding wrong in context. Granted, that's a totally subjective and impossible-to-prove thing.
Most cheap/simple pedals don't actually sound good all the time, in fact, most of the time they don't play well with others and sound pretty gross.
So that's my "I wish": I wish for a line of simpler pedals that always sound good.
You just listed everything that I love about Dr Scientist's pedals. Amazing on every setting, can get weird, and stack very very well with everything.
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:03 pm
by Bellyheart
More double effect pedals. Not like two channel pedals, but uglyface kinda deal. Tremfuzz, delayverbs, fuzzwah, envelope rings, octave rings....whatever. I like when two different effects are in a box and control the amount is coming out. Dispatch Master is a good example...but I'd like to see some not so sensible combos.
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:12 pm
by coldbrightsunlight
Bellyheart wrote:More double effect pedals. Not like two channel pedals, but uglyface kinda deal. Tremfuzz, delayverbs, fuzzwah, envelope rings, octave rings....whatever. I like when two different effects are in a box and control the amount is coming out. Dispatch Master is a good example...but I'd like to see some not so sensible combos.
Yeah that's super awesome and there should be a lot more.
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:14 pm
by fungalattack
bring on the delayveeeerrrbsss!
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:14 pm
by skullservant
I think there should be more fuzz + filter combos out there. I know there is the Malekko 213 (?) and I've seen Creepy Fingers put a wah and fuzz in the same shell, but I just love the found of fuzz with fixed wahs
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:58 pm
by julius_deane
Bellyheart wrote:More double effect pedals. Not like two channel pedals, but uglyface kinda deal. Tremfuzz, delayverbs, fuzzwah, envelope rings, octave rings....whatever. I like when two different effects are in a box and control the amount is coming out. Dispatch Master is a good example...but I'd like to see some not so sensible combos.
I can't think of many examples of this where I don't like 1 alot and the other not so much.
e.g., while I like the phaser in the Crystal Dagger, I have almost no use for it, while I could use the fuzz ON EVERYTHING ALL OF THE TIME.