Pedal trends that need to go begin
Moderator: Ghost Hip
- julius_deane
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:27 pm
- Location: Saint Louis
- Contact:
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Bronzetalon would say "top mount jacks", but I'd just be happy with the in, out, and power not all being on different sides.
Also, everything should have a built-in boost, even if it's just trim pot. Gen 5 Echo, Brigadier, etc. are great examples of this.
Also, everything should have a built-in boost, even if it's just trim pot. Gen 5 Echo, Brigadier, etc. are great examples of this.
i'm a grrnoise
- mathias
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 3868
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:25 pm
- Location: noosphere
- Contact:
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
julius_deane wrote:Bronzetalon would say "top mount jacks", but I'd just be happy with the in, out, and power not all being on different sides.
Also, everything should have a built-in boost, even if it's just trim pot. Gen 5 Echo, Brigadier, etc. are great examples of this.
+1 to boost in everything.
ILF Equipped 
If you can read this, then I'm back?
Searching for that new sound.skullservant wrote:You can like whatever you want so long as it makes you happy
If you can read this, then I'm back?
- skullservant
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 16575
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:55 am
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
with the option of pre or post boost, especially on fuzzes. It's not hard to wire up with a 4dpt switch either
- mathias
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 3868
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:25 pm
- Location: noosphere
- Contact:
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
And SHO's, LPB's, etc are super simple circuits and fit in tiny places. Cheap parts, too.
ILF Equipped 
If you can read this, then I'm back?
Searching for that new sound.skullservant wrote:You can like whatever you want so long as it makes you happy
If you can read this, then I'm back?
- skullservant
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 16575
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:55 am
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
yep!! Exactly.
-
Officer Bukowski
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 3307
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:13 pm
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Achtane wrote:Momentary feedback switches on non-diy delays

I make pedals. SHARK TANK
- Dark Barn
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1801
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:12 am
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
More pedals with variable high pass filters for cleaning up the low end. I love this feature on my Timeline and my former Polytope. I think a few fuzzes that use clean blend would benefit more from a HPF implementation instead, you just don't see many builders doing it.
- fungalattack
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1623
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 3:20 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
shouldn't there just be momentary feedback switches on every pedal?
- mathias
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 3868
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:25 pm
- Location: noosphere
- Contact:
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
I know that people like lots of controls with a very wide range, especially sounds that are just plain weird, out there, never before heard..
But sometimes I just wish for simple pedals that sound really good on any settings, and always stack well with other pedals. Like, always musical and never sounding wrong in context. Granted, that's a totally subjective and impossible-to-prove thing.
Most cheap/simple pedals don't actually sound good all the time, in fact, most of the time they don't play well with others and sound pretty gross.
So that's my "I wish": I wish for a line of simpler pedals that always sound good.
But sometimes I just wish for simple pedals that sound really good on any settings, and always stack well with other pedals. Like, always musical and never sounding wrong in context. Granted, that's a totally subjective and impossible-to-prove thing.
Most cheap/simple pedals don't actually sound good all the time, in fact, most of the time they don't play well with others and sound pretty gross.
So that's my "I wish": I wish for a line of simpler pedals that always sound good.
ILF Equipped 
If you can read this, then I'm back?
Searching for that new sound.skullservant wrote:You can like whatever you want so long as it makes you happy
If you can read this, then I'm back?
- 01010111
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 4789
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:48 pm
- Location: Frogtown
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
mathias wrote:I know that people like lots of controls with a very wide range, especially sounds that are just plain weird, out there, never before heard..
But sometimes I just wish for simple pedals that sound really good on any settings, and always stack well with other pedals. Like, always musical and never sounding wrong in context. Granted, that's a totally subjective and impossible-to-prove thing.
Most cheap/simple pedals don't actually sound good all the time, in fact, most of the time they don't play well with others and sound pretty gross.
So that's my "I wish": I wish for a line of simpler pedals that always sound good.
You just listed everything that I love about Dr Scientist's pedals. Amazing on every setting, can get weird, and stack very very well with everything.
- Bellyheart
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 5791
- Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Richmond, Va
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
More double effect pedals. Not like two channel pedals, but uglyface kinda deal. Tremfuzz, delayverbs, fuzzwah, envelope rings, octave rings....whatever. I like when two different effects are in a box and control the amount is coming out. Dispatch Master is a good example...but I'd like to see some not so sensible combos.
- coldbrightsunlight
- Supporter

- Posts: 13666
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Bellyheart wrote:More double effect pedals. Not like two channel pedals, but uglyface kinda deal. Tremfuzz, delayverbs, fuzzwah, envelope rings, octave rings....whatever. I like when two different effects are in a box and control the amount is coming out. Dispatch Master is a good example...but I'd like to see some not so sensible combos.
Yeah that's super awesome and there should be a lot more.
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.
I make music sometimes:
https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/
https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/
https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
I make music sometimes:
https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/
https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/
https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
- fungalattack
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1623
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 3:20 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
bring on the delayveeeerrrbsss!
- skullservant
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 16575
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:55 am
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
I think there should be more fuzz + filter combos out there. I know there is the Malekko 213 (?) and I've seen Creepy Fingers put a wah and fuzz in the same shell, but I just love the found of fuzz with fixed wahs
- julius_deane
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:27 pm
- Location: Saint Louis
- Contact:
Re: Pedal trends that need to go begin
Bellyheart wrote:More double effect pedals. Not like two channel pedals, but uglyface kinda deal. Tremfuzz, delayverbs, fuzzwah, envelope rings, octave rings....whatever. I like when two different effects are in a box and control the amount is coming out. Dispatch Master is a good example...but I'd like to see some not so sensible combos.
I can't think of many examples of this where I don't like 1 alot and the other not so much.
e.g., while I like the phaser in the Crystal Dagger, I have almost no use for it, while I could use the fuzz ON EVERYTHING ALL OF THE TIME.
i'm a grrnoise