ilovefuzz.com

Gearmond wrote:yamaha electrics in general, lets be honest.

dat SGV

RR Bigman wrote:

dubkitty wrote:similarly, there's a lot of axe-grinding (no pun intended) over quality-control at Gibson which goes back a decade or more when from my observations current production appears to have dealt with those issues, and complaints about their pricing which seem unfair compared to higher-priced models from other brands and Gibson's introduction of more models in the $800-1200 MAP zone. sure, i'd like a $1000 Les Paul, too, but when a PRS goes for $4000 and an Eric Clapton Strat for three, is a $2000-2500 LP out of line?

newer gibsons aren't bad quality wise, they just (IMHO) play like shit

cheesecats wrote:

RR Bigman wrote:

dubkitty wrote:similarly, there's a lot of axe-grinding (no pun intended) over quality-control at Gibson which goes back a decade or more when from my observations current production appears to have dealt with those issues, and complaints about their pricing which seem unfair compared to higher-priced models from other brands and Gibson's introduction of more models in the $800-1200 MAP zone. sure, i'd like a $1000 Les Paul, too, but when a PRS goes for $4000 and an Eric Clapton Strat for three, is a $2000-2500 LP out of line?

newer gibsons aren't bad quality wise, they just (IMHO) play like shit

i have 2 les paul 50s tributes with p90s that play like butter and sound like a guitar should. i paid less than $750 each for them. they hit a home run with those. and i'm a fender man.

stereotyping isn't wise. i think all guitar manufacturers have qc issues. i've seen bad martins, fenders, gibsons, rics--i've wondered how some of them made it out of the factory.

Greenfuz wrote:music man amps