behndy wrote:yessuh! you sum up things WELL. i'll pass on the idea to them. it sounds interesting. anything else occur to you?
Does it save all the settings, i.e. taper type/span for each channel, when you unplug the Expressionator?
What happens when you set the 'low' value for the taper higher than the 'high' value? Would the pedal crap out or would that reverse the taper? If it does reverse the taper, then you could conceivably do away with the reverse taper type because you'd be able to set that up through the first. Which would free up a LED spot for a different weird setting. I think the very minor inconvenience of setting it to reverse would be worth the extra wacky taper type especially if it saves all your settings, but I'm biased towards the wacky.
Speaking of a potential extra wacky taper type; random mode. Similar to squarewave but you'd get 77%, 23%, 44%, 66%, 33%, 90%, whatever. Unexpected fun.
If you're up for it, another demo with the focus on buzzsaw and squarewave would be great and more of both pedals being controlled at the same time, preferably with different taper types. Your demo didn't really touch on that much, as you had a fair amount of ground to cover, but again, I like wacky.
The third taper is basically for shitty or non-expression pedals right? So if you have say a Moog EP-2, you wouldn't have a need for the 3rd taper setting, because it would function like the first one. Meaning you could also swap out the 3rd setting for the wacky one. As long as you put up a list of 'proper' expression pedals that have a good sweep that wouldn't require taper #3. That way you can keep El Reverso (or offer 2 more wacky settings) if you have the fancy pants expression pedal. No idea how easy it would be to change that up, just a different line of code in the chip? I wouldn't care about the \ symbol being next to it, but that might just be me.
