Page 185 of 2348
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:17 am
by Ancient Astronaught
t-rey wrote:CaptainBoxman wrote:Gross, and awesome at the same time
This.

yeah......
crohny wrote:Killer. Glad to hear it man. Keep me posted!
Will do broham....
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:49 am
by new05002
mondays. fuckin a
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:02 pm
by Ancient Astronaught
new05002 wrote:mondays. fuckin a

Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:28 pm
by new05002
problems all over the place!
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:30 pm
by AngryGoldfish
Ancient Astronaught wrote:new05002 wrote:mondays. fuckin a

I literally watched that two days ago in bed while I was ill. Soooooooo good.
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:39 pm
by Ancient Astronaught
new05002 wrote:problems all over the place!

AngryGoldfish wrote:Ancient Astronaught wrote:new05002 wrote:mondays. fuckin a

I literally watched that two days ago in bed while I was ill. Soooooooo good.
I watched it a couple weeks ago w/ the wifey. Such a good movie.
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:39 pm
by new05002
neways. Sort of coming to a consensus on the monolith and fog machine designs. Thats always nice.
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:41 pm
by Ancient Astronaught
new05002 wrote:neways. Sort of coming to a consensus on the monolith and fog machine designs. Thats always nice.
NICE!!!!! What did you go with for each?
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:43 pm
by AngryGoldfish
Has anyone had experiencing slaving an amp, specifically a small one into a big one?
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:46 pm
by misterstomach
no time to go back multi quoting, but besides dirt and delay... REVERB. i use it more than delay. it's pretty much always on for me.
congrats to pelliot on the artist. i'm pretty curious about those new reissues, they look really good and seem to be a step up from the other recently made artists.
as far as what dan was saying about the sound of the vintage ones compared to an LP, i think that's the pickups and not really the guitar. i really didn't get along with the stock pickups. even though people on the internet say they're great or whatever. the ones i had played before mine didn't have the stock pickups, so when i got mine, i was taken aback by how much less i liked it. i swapped the bridge for a duncan distortion and was immediately much happier.
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:48 pm
by Ancient Astronaught
AngryGoldfish wrote:Has anyone had experiencing slaving an amp, specifically a small one into a big one?
I slave big to big if that helps, what would you like to know?
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:49 pm
by new05002
Well i wanted to do the SVT mid control on the monolith. Somehow I wanted to add a good mid control onto a passive james EQ. However the SVT mid control needs 3 triode gain stages, and inductors. So its costly in terms of real estate, and inductors are more difficult to source. However, in a stroke of luck or what have you, Oli Foxen sent me a schematic of a Burman amp he wanted to have simulated after seeing the sort of analysis on did on amp EQs in the TB thread I made. So I simulated that and the mid control from that amp is an active mid boost control with no inductors and only needs 1 triode gain stage. I was able to put that into the schematic, and did not need any extra gain stages as I could use the gain stage to both act as the mid range control and drive the baxandall. In an added bonus it also decreases the amp gain as it is used up to be able to have the active mid range. So that design is nearly done and only uses 3 pre tubes.
Fog Machine well I finally found a way that I could have switchable gain from EA MV-120 level and then more on top of that if need be with a single switch. Overall does not disturb the root design. either.
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:49 pm
by new05002
doesnt matter if its small to big or any combination. You just jacking preamp into power amp.
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:55 pm
by Ancient Astronaught
new05002 wrote:Well i wanted to do the SVT mid control on the monolith. Somehow I wanted to add a good mid control onto a passive james EQ. However the SVT mid control needs 3 triode gain stages, and inductors. So its costly in terms of real estate, and inductors are more difficult to source. However, in a stroke of luck or what have you, Oli Foxen sent me a schematic of a Burman amp he wanted to have simulated after seeing the sort of analysis on did on amp EQs in the TB thread I made. So I simulated that and the mid control from that amp is an active mid boost control with no inductors and only needs 1 triode gain stage. I was able to put that into the schematic, and did not need any extra gain stages as I could use the gain stage to both act as the mid range control and drive the baxandall. In an added bonus it also decreases the amp gain as it is used up to be able to have the active mid range. So that design is nearly done and only uses 3 pre tubes.
Fog Machine well I finally found a way that I could have switchable gain from EA MV-120 level and then more on top of that if need be with a single switch. Overall does not disturb the root design. either.
Dude that's pretty sick!!!! Saving real estate and increasing clean gain on the amp is right up my alley!!! I take it the monoliths going to be your pedal amp while the fog machine is all amp dirt? Still thinking 200w each?
Re: The Doom Room: ILF Edition
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:56 pm
by new05002
150W each. monolith is being sourced out of my old SC120R which probably can hit around 150W with 6 el34s. and the FM is Model T iron and 4 KT88s