ilovefuzz.com

lol. gonna ignore the somewhat condenscending YOU'RE NOT DEEP ENOUGH TO GEEEEET IIIIIIT shit in there because i don't really give two shakes of a dead dog's cock (loooooove you Spidey Jehosatat) what you think of me or how i come off to you.

some things. are boring. sorry if that's not navel gaze'y enough or multisyllabic a discription to tickle you, but if a piece of media didn't do it's job enough to engage me, rarely do i care enough to get into WHY it failed. that's putting more effort than the creators probably did.

NOW I NEED TO FIND ME SOME NEKID LAYDAYS SHOVING M80'S UP THEIR DELICATE BITS.

'MURICA.

I never said anything about anybody not being deep enough or not getting anything. Where did I say that?

Tone, on the other hand, is a funny thing on the internet and you'll just have to take my word for it that condescension wasn't my intent.

Still, I stand by my contention that if the only thing that you can critique about a movie or book or album or whatever is that "its boring", then your opinion is essentially worthless.

lol. i too, am not trying to start a fight. because internet fights, while HILARIOUS, are idiotic.

but shit like that? "your opinion is essentially worthless"? when someone responds to someone else voicing their opinion in a way they don't agree with like that it makes me think they're pretentious douches that are more interested in seeming intelligent than having a conversation.

i don't really care if it comes across lowbrow or uninformed or "worthless". some movies are fucking boring. i'm not going to invest the time to describe why something sucks in most cases if the creator didn't put enough effort into make it interesting at some level.

and i LIKE silly bad movies that have a scene or two of awesome. make me remember or being impressed by SOMETHING. and Citizen Kane never did that for me. i appreciate the artistry for it's time but it's a boring movie.

hence over-rated. to me.

hence the type of movies this thread was about.

behndy wrote:but what if a movie WAS boring? KickAss 2 was a shit movie because it was boring. sure you can be more specific and say that instead of making a parody or deconstruction of a Superhero movie like the first one they forgot and made a shitty uninteresting superhero movie... but it was just written where all the humor and characters and dialogue was flat and.... boring.

In short, it's just like the first mowie.

behndy wrote:lol. i too, am not trying to start a fight. because internet fights, while HILARIOUS, are idiotic.

but shit like that? "your opinion is essentially worthless"? when someone responds to someone else voicing their opinion in a way they don't agree with like that it makes me think they're pretentious douches that are more interested in seeming intelligent than having a conversation.

i don't really care if it comes across lowbrow or uninformed or "worthless". some movies are fucking boring. i'm not going to invest the time to describe why something sucks in most cases if the creator didn't put enough effort into make it interesting at some level.

and i LIKE silly bad movies that have a scene or two of awesome. make me remember or being impressed by SOMETHING. and Citizen Kane never did that for me. i appreciate the artistry for it's time but it's a boring movie.

hence over-rated. to me.

hence the type of movies this thread was about.

you seem to confuse "lowbrow" with "meaningless". You can have lowbrow tastes. You can like lowbrow movies. I don't care what you like or don't like. But "it's boring" tells me nothing. There's no conversation there. Might as well just type "movie bad".

meh. we just disagree apparently.

movies that fall short of something i think would have been neat? those are fun to talk about where they failed. movies that are just a pile of uninteresting shite, i don't care enough to put any effort into describing it or even thinking about it later.

SOME MOVIES ARE BORING. MOVIE BAD.

i looooooveeee you Haki. so much. KICKASS 01 WAS GOOD. not as good as the graphic novel, but i liked it a lot. next to Super it's my favorite superhero deconstruction movie.

behndy wrote:

onyxrhino wrote:...... Also, it's kind of ridiculous to take one small "plothole" (which is a debatable) and declare that Citizen Kane doesn't make sense......

lol. of COURSE it's ridiculous. you think i'm being serious. eeeeee. i RARELY do that. that's not why i don't enjoy that movie.

onyxrhino wrote:....which is a more interesting critique than "it's boring" or "it doesn't make sense").

but what if a movie WAS boring? KickAss 2 was a shit movie because it was boring. sure you can be more specific and say that instead of making a parody or deconstruction of a Superhero movie like the first one they forgot and made a shitty uninteresting superhero movie... but it was just written where all the humor and characters and dialogue was flat and.... boring. i dunno. if a movie bores me and doesn't grab hold of me, it obviously doesn't interest me. i don't spend a lot of time on things that don't interest me, not breaking things down or getting in depth for why i don't like something follows from that.

Yeah, but it makes you come off as a doodoo for brain.

I tend to equate people who doen't like things aesthetically but can't explain it with the sort of attitudes that lead to censorship and xenophobia. "I don't like it and I don't care to find out why because I might be wrong and find out it's not that bad at all, only different or out of my pallette." I see you can articulate these things but if you can't prove it you're making yourself seem less intelligent than some simile I can't come up with right now.

that's just silly. if i talk to something i care about or am engaged with? sure. i'll be a gerbose motherfucker and wax poetic about all the awesome or bad. but something i don't care about? meh. i WATCHED the damn movie. that means i opened myself up to anything interesting they have to say. if i didn't find anything worth remembering or didn't care then.... it's a boring movie.

i don't care about cars. if someone wants to tell me how awesome the cam shaft flangleneer they installed lets them rev to 2 quintillion lbs of torque when they're Tokyo Drifting? i have no interest in that. i don't have anything to bring to the conversation. and i wouldn't be a dismissive prick but.... it's a subject that doesn't interest me. same with a poorly put together movie. it's just BORING.

Monsters (the 2010 British 'un) was neaaaaaat. very different, smaller take on how something like that would affect people. i love movies that explain things subtly. without having a character point at something and scream out the thing they just showed you.

also, YOU'RE a doodoo brain Snippley.

THPPPBBBBBBBTTTTT.

I'd say there's a difference between a poorly put together movie (aka bad movie) and something that's about a subject matter that isn't interesting to you.

meh. fuck off. i'm tired as BUTTS. slept extra shitty last night. THAT'S THE BEST ANALOGY I GOTS IN MR RIGHT NOW.

*tears off clothes*

*lotions up*

that is IT. i'm'a massage you into oblivion little boy. LET'S DO THIS.

TACKKKKKKLEEEEEEEEE.

Now that wouldn't be an overrated movie!

oh HELL naw. i neve leave knucka's disappointed.

male OR female kanuckah knahs.

PROVE A POINT WITH POUNDING FORCE.

Haki wrote:

behndy wrote:but what if a movie WAS boring? KickAss 2 was a shit movie because it was boring. sure you can be more specific and say that instead of making a parody or deconstruction of a Superhero movie like the first one they forgot and made a shitty uninteresting superhero movie... but it was just written where all the humor and characters and dialogue was flat and.... boring.

In short, it's just like the first mowie.

oh you dirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrty little grrLs.

hope you have FUN at your slumber party. talking about BOYS and how KICKASS SUCKED and PAINTING EACH OTHER'S TOENAILS.

.......... totally not jelly at all.

TOTALLY.