Page 17 of 23
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 6:18 am
by FuzzHugger
Temporarily locked.
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:26 pm
by Chumley
How much would we have to pay Tom to get him to post his honest reaction to this thread, devi's posts, and the reactions to both?
I'll throw down fifty.
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:35 pm
by madmax1012
Chumley wrote:How much would we have to pay Tom to get him to post his honest reaction to this thread, devi's posts, and the reactions to both?
I'll throw down fifty.
if this is the case, I'd buy a pedal
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:51 pm
by wsas3
I'll throw down!
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 6:01 pm
by dubkitty
you'd better not shout,
you'd better not cry,
you'd better not pout,
i'm telling you why:
MANIC PHASE IS COMING TOOOOO TOOO-OWN!
just a try
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 6:05 pm
by askthedust
just a try at renaming a post's title to not be accused of homophobic insults.
Hey Laekna
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 6:07 pm
by askthedust
I thought you were an "informatician" dude. See how simple it is changing a subject?
I can't believe the only one person in this thread I actually met in real life is the one that has accused me of the worst things in this thread.
(yeah I'd rather be called a Levy than a homophobic).
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 6:11 pm
by Zounds Perspex
ugh, what is going on in this thread? why did I even click? retreat!
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 6:23 pm
by madmax1012
Zounds Perspex wrote:ugh, what is going on in this thread? why did I even click? retreat!
nope the first 10 pages should be included in the ILF initiation process.
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:29 pm
by Adoom
(wonderfully apt gif. comandeered from devulljp)
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:16 pm
by wsas3
The dirty butthole comment isn't homophobic, it's a bit unsettling that people would so easily look for that stuff. In case people didn't know, everybody has buttholes, both men and women, and some of them are dirty.
Or is the homophobic thing related to something different?
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:23 pm
by Scruffie
wsas3 wrote:everybody has buttholes.
Wait... what?
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:23 pm
by nightraven
wsas3 wrote:The dirty butthole comment isn't homophobic, it's a bit unsettling that people would so easily look for that stuff. In case people didn't know, everybody has buttholes, both men and women, and some of them are dirty.
Or is the homophobic thing related to something different?
i figured homosexuals would have cleaner buttholes, no?
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 8:32 pm
by wsas3
nightraven wrote:wsas3 wrote:The dirty butthole comment isn't homophobic, it's a bit unsettling that people would so easily look for that stuff. In case people didn't know, everybody has buttholes, both men and women, and some of them are dirty.
Or is the homophobic thing related to something different?
i figured homosexuals would have cleaner buttholes, no?
I have no, clue, homosexuals were the last thing on my mind when I changed the title for my post. That's right, it was me!
quote="Scruffie"]
wsas3 wrote:everybody has buttholes.
Wait... what?
[/quote]
SSSSHHHH
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 9:08 pm
by the_carl
Scruffie wrote:wsas3 wrote:everybody has buttholes.
Wait... what?
This actually isn't true. Imperforate anus:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0002132/