Page 16 of 23
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 3:03 am
by warwick.hoy
devnulljp wrote:behndy wrote:derp. iphone. porves = proves, to = too.

*terrorists
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 3:04 am
by askthedust
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 3:07 am
by wdinc01
What a beautiful read. I saw this thread when it first started, and haven't been on since page two. And I come back and it gets up to 16 pages? That's great and all, but where the fuck was all this mess yesterday when I was working eight hours with nothing to read?
If only I had a Devi bomb that I could set off in threads. That would get things going. Seriously though, Devi needs to leave ILF.
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 3:11 am
by behndy
i was all "the FUCK Warwickah. shit doesn't even LOAD. thanks for the blank tease of-OH. ah. Marquee. BEARSTS."
durp squared.
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 3:56 am
by testertube
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 4:35 am
by laekna
it's funny to see you Nicolas writing proudly on the DE forum a few weeks ago the list of her pedals you use , and now shiting on her and her job ... this thread is really make me sick

Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 4:44 am
by Adoom
Every thread needs more SPACERITUAL.
And Laekna, Nicolas is proabably pissed because of incidents around page 3 and 4. This thread wasn't her work. She was very insulting towards, as you've pointed out, a formerly proud customer, getting involved in things that have nothing to do with her. Yeah.
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 4:48 am
by askthedust
laekna wrote:it's funny to see you Nicolas writing proudly on the DE forum a few weeks ago the list of her pedals you use , and now shiting on her and her job ... this thread is really make me sick

WOW just tell me where the fuck I shat on her job? I use my two big DE pedals constantly. I made a Rocket demo, I introduced her to Billy saying to him the Soda Meiser was unlike anything else on the market and then Jerome (the other ATD's guitarist) showed him my demo when they were back at Claire's place.
Then Devi used SP and BC as part of her communication strategy, and of course it was her right to do so, and probably sold tons of pedals based on the asumption that BC liked them and that the Rocket nailed the SD tone (I still receive 3 messages a week on my YouTube account about the Rocket video).
(she never thanked me for all that btw).
If you refer to my "changing resistor value" post, yes, I confirm that I shit on her marketing strategy : I have something like 12 different Devi circuit in 2 pedals, I can confirm how close they are to each others, and that it sucks to charge 95$ for each of them.
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 4:54 am
by Holy Schnikes
Ugly girls are commonly stereotyped as needing constant attention and validation through whatever means necessary. Devi's been confirming this harsh generalization with amazing consistency throughout the years. Some really solid evidence contained in this thread, good read so far.
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 4:58 am
by laekna
i mean when you changed the title of the thread you let during a few minutes... it stay on the title reply Nicolas, and that was not a funny title (not for me anyway)
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:02 am
by Adoom
askthedust wrote:I still receive 3 messages a week on my YouTube account about the Rocket video).
(she never thanked me for all that btw).
Checked out your youtube dude, some subscriptions going down.
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:05 am
by askthedust
laekna wrote:i mean when you changed the title of the thread you let during a few minutes... it stay on the title reply Nicolas, and that was not a funny title (not for me anyway)
please speak french I really don't get it. The original title was "So, Infanem doesn't take returns".
Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:25 am
by Bassus Sanguinis
tuffteef wrote: 
and you fogs wanted to lock it
Locking threads rightaway - as seen on TGP
Temp Banning after warning - as seen on Talk Bass
Not giving a shit, not taking a shit, because we're not in the shit business - as seen nowhere else but ILF
Flames and bull shitting around these corners of the world usually doesn't get locked when people start calling names. Because eventually the flames die anyway - unlike fuzz. Neither has users been temporarily banned because that's a sorry way to chastise forum users showing the forum admin and/or mods are too afraid of loosing members. Fuck that shit!
Threads get locked when there's nothing relevant to see there anymore. More importantly ILF also swings the fucking BAN HAMMER if necessary, nothing more, nothing less. If You're told to tone it down a notch, follow the advice, and everybody continues from there. I expect it's about time. Dum-dee-dum.
no I'm NOT a mod on this forum, nor pretending to be one. I just have tried to pay attention to what little has been moderated on this board.

Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:37 am
by askthedust
askthedust wrote:laekna wrote:i mean when you changed the title of the thread you let during a few minutes... it stay on the title reply Nicolas, and that was not a funny title (not for me anyway)
please speak french I really don't get it. The original title was "So, Infanem doesn't take returns".
Problem solved. He thought I had renamed the thread "Devi licks blablabla"

Re: So, Infanem used to not have a return policy.
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:51 am
by laekna
yeah, problem solved in pm, sorry Nicolas.