Page 15 of 36
Re: The controversial gear thread
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:38 pm
by vallaton
ALLisNOISE wrote:AlexGlassLungs wrote:Ok so if there is no deference why did Keely make mods to the Line 6 Pedals? Why do brands like Diamond, Empress, and Chase Bliss make it so a digital path is blended into your analog path instead of just going straight into a digital circuit? You know why? Because going stight into a digital circuit and back out effects your analog signal... no one would go through the trouble of those designs if it didn’t
Because of people of your ilk...
Buying with their eyes
my top3 to buy with:
1) the tingly feeling in my pants
2) my eyes
3) strangers' opinions in the internet
i might get things wrong from time to time, but at least i have loads of pedals to keep me warm.
Re: The controversial gear thread
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:38 pm
by AlexGlassLungs
D.o.S. wrote:AlexGlassLungs wrote:Ok so if there is no deference why did Keely make mods to the Line 6 Pedals? Why do brands like Diamond, Empress, and Chase Bliss make it so a digital path is blended into your analog path instead of just going straight into a digital circuit? You know why? Because going stight into a digital circuit and back out effects your analog signal... no one would go through the trouble of those designs if it didn’t
I can't. I just can't.
This is equivalent to you saying I’m wrong and not “respecting my opinions”.
Re: The controversial gear thread
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:39 pm
by D.o.S.
Very astute. I don't respect your opinions, because you haven't the faintest idea of what you are talking about.
Re: The controversial gear thread
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:40 pm
by ThurberMingus
Wait you have 18 pedals?
Post a pic of your rig dog that sounds wild!
Re: The controversial gear thread
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:41 pm
by AlexGlassLungs
actualidiot wrote:AlexGlassLungs wrote:Ok so if there is no deference why did Keely make mods to the Line 6 Pedals? Why do brands like Diamond, Empress, and Chase Bliss make it so a digital path is blended into your analog path instead of just going straight into a digital circuit? You know why? Because going stight into a digital circuit and back out effects your analog signal... no one would go through the trouble of those designs if it didn’t
In CBA pedals at least, your signal never gets digitized. The digital part is only controlling the functions. You can't blend digital and analog signals, it's either analog or digital. Your post doesn't really make sense.
Joel made a graph on how this works, your signal gets split into 3 signals when it reaches the input, 2 are then affected while your analog signal goes straight through, the digital effect them meet your analog effect when coming out the output keeping the analog path intact while the other part of your signal goes through its digital path
Re: The controversial gear thread
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:42 pm
by vallaton
AlexGlassLungs wrote:D.o.S. wrote:AlexGlassLungs wrote:Ok so if there is no deference why did Keely make mods to the Line 6 Pedals? Why do brands like Diamond, Empress, and Chase Bliss make it so a digital path is blended into your analog path instead of just going straight into a digital circuit? You know why? Because going stight into a digital circuit and back out effects your analog signal... no one would go through the trouble of those designs if it didn’t
I can't. I just can't.
This is equivalent to you saying I’m wrong and not “respecting my opinions”.
not all things should be respected just because people might call them "opinions".
Re: The controversial gear thread
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:43 pm
by AlexGlassLungs
D.o.S. wrote:Very astute. I don't respect your opinions, because you haven't the faintest idea of what you are talking about.
And you dont chime with your opinions on the matter because apparently you’re just here to judge and prevent yourself from me calling you out on any false statements you post and looking like an idiot
Re: The controversial gear thread
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:43 pm
by comesect2.0
I was playing guitar a minute ago and had to take a shit...kinda bummned out cuz I was trying to get this super awesome riff down, now I'm just holdin my penis down readin this crap.
....yeah, post a pic lungs. I dare you.
Re: The controversial gear thread
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:44 pm
by actual
AlexGlassLungs wrote:actualidiot wrote:AlexGlassLungs wrote:Ok so if there is no deference why did Keely make mods to the Line 6 Pedals? Why do brands like Diamond, Empress, and Chase Bliss make it so a digital path is blended into your analog path instead of just going straight into a digital circuit? You know why? Because going stight into a digital circuit and back out effects your analog signal... no one would go through the trouble of those designs if it didn’t
In CBA pedals at least, your signal never gets digitized. The digital part is only controlling the functions. You can't blend digital and analog signals, it's either analog or digital. Your post doesn't really make sense.
Joel made a graph on how this works, your signal gets split into 3 signals when it reaches the input, 2 are then affected while your analog signal goes straight through, the digital effect them meet your analog effect when coming out the output keeping the analog path intact while the other part of your signal goes through its digital path
I'd like a link plox
From the CBA faq:
"Is the signal path really analog?
Yes, the signal path is 100% analog. There exist some analog devices that can interface with little digital microprocessors (stuff like bucket brigades, light dependent resistors, etc.). These parts are not cheap, but I’m going for quality and uniqueness here, not trying to save a buck. There are tons of boutique companies out there that do a great job selling analog effects pedals without the digital control. I’m not that company and am not interested in that."
Re: The controversial gear thread
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:46 pm
by D.o.S.
AlexGlassLungs wrote:D.o.S. wrote:Very astute. I don't respect your opinions, because you haven't the faintest idea of what you are talking about.
And you dont chime with your opinions on the matter because apparently you’re just here to judge and prevent yourself from me calling you out on any false statements you post and looking like an idiot
I think this is the first time in my six years here someone has accused me of not chiming in with an opinion.
Re: The controversial gear thread
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:49 pm
by vallaton
btw, what is THE matter to chime in on this thread?
Re: The controversial gear thread
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:49 pm
by Chankgeez
Re: The controversial gear thread
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:52 pm
by Ghost Hip
Re: The controversial gear thread
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:54 pm
by vallaton
i think i need a new cap for the winter. all i have is a boring grey one. orange might be too much for me, but what about like some nice earthy tones? maybe like a tobacco burst cap. that would be objectively better than what i currently have.
Re: The controversial gear thread
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:54 pm
by AlexGlassLungs
ThurberMingus wrote:Wait you have 18 pedals?
Post a pic of your rig dog that sounds wild!
I can’t post a photo from my phone but this is what I have:
Polytune mini
Bondi 2026 Compressor
SS/BS TAFM
Cooper FX ARPP
Mr. Black Octave II
Recovery Effects OD
Arc Effect Klone
Ezhi&Aka pre Terverb
Ezhi&Aka Tape T
Industrialectric RM n1
Stamme[n]
Empress phaser
Empress Tape Delay
Pladask elektrisk Romferd
Diamond Quantum leap
Mr. Black Supermoon chrome
Dr scientist Frazz
Dr scientist bitquest
